Epstein Secrets

t discovery stage. See Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. I. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). Accordingly, Epstein

other inquiries related to the same subject matter in this case, the related cases and those matters outlined in Epstein's in camera submissions at D.E. #s 282 and 283. Given the allegations raised in the various Complaints and the elements 5 EFTA00222432 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 462 Enter

t discovery stage. See Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340. 352 (1978). Accordingly, Epstein

other inquiries related to the same subject matter in this case, the related cases and those matters outlined in Epstein's in camera submissions at D.E. #s 282 and 283. Given the allegations raised in the various Complaints and the elements 5 EFTA00592195 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 462 Enter

n. 16, 1990. Defendant who allegedly breached nonprosecu- lion agreement moved to dismiss indictment or to suppress statements. The District Court, Sanders, Chief Judge, held that: (I) defendant, who refused to cooperate by failing to meet with Government representatives, failing to testify before gra

EPSTEIN upon her, Plaintiff intends to rely exclusively on the statutory damages, rather than those damages which are available at common law. (See D.E. 113). If however, the Court rules that the statutory floor applies only one time, regardless of the number of times EPSTEIN committed an enumerated