Epstein Secrets

la. 1966). It is not enough for the opposing party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (F1a.1979) (same). Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a summary judgment motion su

onzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein. For example, Epstein alleges generally that "Edwards's... actions constitute a fraud upon Epstein as [Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler], [Scott] Rothstein and the Litigation Team represented themselves to be acting in good faith and with the best interests of their clien

om? 2 A It was a little bit bigger. Obviously it was 3 configured differently. Thin isn't a rectangular 4 office. I worked for Marty Fine and Bernie 4 Jacobson in Miami. They didn't have an open door / policy. • So their office was set up in the ➢ane way 9 as Rothstein? 10 Il 12 13 la

noon or evening, and I went to that. 10 So there were probably about seven or IL eight or nine of u➢ there. Somebody -- maybe Stuart 12 13 IS Rosenfeldt -- had already hired Kendall Coffey, who was -- Kendall la a Miami attorney. Kendall and I practiced together at Greenberg Traurig in the '70a. Ke

ued with the investigation by bringing her concern to the attention of Chuck Sanders, Senior Vice President, Chief Risk & Chief Compliance Office ("Sanders"). After reviewing the file, Sanders agreed with Ansari and the two jointly escalated the matter to Gibraltar Bank's CFO, COO and CEO. In the face

g independently verified; b. Berenfeld's complicity in the Ponzi scheme is further compounded by its role as accountants for RRA and Rothstein and Rosenfeldt individually, providing it with first-hand knowledge of the patent inconsistencies between Banyon's purported verified audited receivables and RRA'