Epstein Secrets

H3V0GIU1 1 these other things that are circulating about her that have 2 nothing to do with Ms. Maxwell. 3 Mr. Cassell referred to our expert Phillip Esplin, 4 Dr. Esplin, and saying that he agreed not to refer to 5 as a prostitute. Your Honor, that came up in the 6 context of a cross examination in

ork street 20 that, "I am referring to the statement that we made." As we 21 set forth in our summary judgment brief, this Court's ruling in 22 Adelson v. Harris is directly on point, that a mere reference 23 to another writing that contains defamatory statements does not 24 constitute an actiona

VOGIU1 53 1 these other things that are circulating about her that have 2 nothing to do with Ms. Maxwell. 3 Mr. Cassell referred to our expert Phillip Esplin, 4 Dr. Esplin, and saying that he agreed not to refer to 5 s a prostitute. Your Honor, that came up in the 6 context of a cross examination in

t on a New York street that, "I am referring to the statement that we made." As we set forth in our summary judgment brief, this Court's ruling in Adelson v. Harris is directly on point, that a mere reference to another writing that contains defamatory statements does not constitute an actionable repe

24 25 53 H3VOGIU1 these other things that are circulating about her that have nothing to do with Ms. Maxwell. Mr. Cassell referred to our expert Phillip Esplin, Dr. Esplin, and saying that he agreed not to refer to Virginia Roberts as a prostitute. Your Honor, that came up in the context of a cross examina

t on a New York street that, "I am referring to the statement that we made." As we set forth in our summary judgment brief, this Court's ruling in Adelson v. Harris is directly on point, that a mere reference to another writing that contains defamatory statements does not constitute an actionable repe