Epstein Secrets

extra time to take these six depositions. The only witnesses for whom depositions should be permitted following the discovery cut-off are: (1) Ms. Sharon Churcher, Plaintiff's friend, advocate and former journalist with the Daily Mail, who filed a Motion to Quash her subpoena on the day before her scheduled d

re for trial. Thus, if the Court grants Plaintiff's motion, the remaining deadlines in the Scheduling Order ought to be extended accordingly. 2 Ms. Churcher's motion to quash will be heard this Thursday by the Court. Ms. Maxwell is filing simultaneously with this Response a Motion to Re-Open Plaintiffs D

. For example, Plaintiff issued a 12 McCawley Decl. in Support of Request to Exceed Ten Deposition Limit, Exhibit I (Doc. # 173.1) at 28 (Letter of Menninger to McCawley (Feb. 25, 2015) ("I would suggest that rather than repeated entails on the topic of scheduling the various depositions in this case, or

FENDANT'S COMBINED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DEPOSITIONS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF RULE 45 Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON. MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 EFTA00605112 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Docu

llegations. Prince Andrew is an example. Disclosing her story publicly for the first time in March 2011 in an "exclusive" relationship with reporter Sharon Churcher, plaintiff had every incentive and opportunity to tell her entire story honestly and completely. She told Churcher she 5 EFTA00792760 did not ha

relationship with reporter Sharon Churcher, plaintiff had every incentive and opportunity to tell her entire story honestly and completely. She told Churcher she 5 EFTA00792760 did not have sex with Prince Andrew. Less than four years later, after engaging a lawyer, plaintiff alleged she was "forced"

nted by the Plaintiff in her case in chief, Ms. Maxwell may offer testimony from the following witnesses at trial: 1. Ghislaine Maxwell (live) c/o Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Ave. Denver, CO 80203 2. Kathy Alexander (live) Michaelhouse Pvt Bag X1 Balgowan KwaZulu-Natal 3

llegations. Prince Andrew is an example. Disclosing her story publicly for the first time in March 2011 in an "exclusive" relationship with reporter Sharon Churcher, plaintiff had every incentive and opportunity to tell her entire story honestly and completely. She told Churcher she 5 EFTA00617400 did not ha

relationship with reporter Sharon Churcher, plaintiff had every incentive and opportunity to tell her entire story honestly and completely. She told Churcher she 5 EFTA00617400 did not have sex with Prince Andrew. Less than four years later, after engaging a lawyer, plaintiff alleged she was "forced"

ented by the Plaintiff in her case in chief, Ms. Maxwell may offer testimony from the following witnesses at trial: 1. Ghislaine Maxwell (live) do Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Ave. Denver, CO 80203 2. Kathy (live) 3. Miles (live) 4. Philip Barden (live) Devonshires So

bmit this Declaration in support of Ms. Maxwell’s Motion for Summary Judgment.’ 2. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an article by Sharon Churcher entitled “Prince Andrew and the 17-year-old girl his sex offender flew to Britain to meet him,” DAILY MAIL, dated March 2, 2011. ' At trial, defend

F NEW YORK pane eee ene een enenenee X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, : Plaintiff, V. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, : Defendant. . ee X Declaration of Laura A. Menninger in Support of Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment I, Laura A. Menninger, declare as follows: 1. Iam an attorney at law duly licensed in the Sta

and correct copy of a statement on behalf of Ms. Maxwell dated January 2, 2015. 3. Attached as Exhibit B 1s a true and correct copy of an article by Sharon Churcher titled “Teenage girl recruited by paedophile Jeffrey Epstein reveals how she twice met Bill Clinton,” DAILY MAIL, dated March 5, 2011. HOUSE_OVERSI

F NEW YORK pane eee ene een enenenee X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, : Plaintiff, V. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, : Defendant. . ee X Declaration of Laura A. Menninger in Support of Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine I, Laura A. Menninger, declare as follows: 1. Iam an attorney at law d

s. Inc.,: Daily News, L.P. Intervenor: Michael Cernovich d/b/a Cernovich Media; Alan M. Dershowitz Material Witness: Miscellaneous: Respondent: Sharon Churcher; Jeffrey Epstein DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:15cv7433 OTHER DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:17mc00025 U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 17-01625 FILING DAT

;ATTORNEY TO] Haddon Morgan and Foreman 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO, USA 80203 (303)-831-7364 Fax: (303)-832-2628 Email:[email protected] Laura A. Menninger [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East Tenth Avenue Denver, CO, USA 80203 (303)-831-7364 Fax: (303)-832-2628 Email.Lm

, By: Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell: HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C., 150 East 10th Avenue, Denver, CO 80203, By: Laura A. Menninger, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq., Ty Gee, Esq. Counsel for Intervenor Michael Cemovich: RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC, 100 Pearl Street, 14th Floor,

ed on the difficult balancing of the conflicting principles described below. I. Prior Proceedings In early 2011 , in an interview with journalist Sharon Churcher ("Churcher") which was published in two British tabloids, described Maxwell's alleged role as someone who recruited or facilitated the recruitment

t balancing of the conflicting principles described below. I. Prior Proceedings In early 2011 , in an interview with journalist Sharon Churcher ("Churcher") which was published in two British tabloids, described Maxwell's alleged role as someone who recruited or facilitated the recruitment of young fe

District of New York ew or 0007 Re: Au 3, 2020 Order (Doc. 1096) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P C Laura A. Menninger Denver, Colorado 80203 wvow.hmilaw.com Dear Judge Preska: I write in response to the Court's Order of August 3, 2020 (Doc. 1069), the Order and

ntiff's Brief in Support of the Privilege Claimed for In Camera Submission • 155 — Defendant's Motion to Compel Non-Privileged Documents • 215 - Sharon Churcher Motion to Quash Subpoena • 231 — Defendant's Motion to Reopen Deposition of Plaintiff Counsel for Ms. Maxwell is available for a telephone confere