Epstein Secrets

ed on the difficult balancing of the conflicting principles described below. I. Prior Proceedings In early 2011 , in an interview with journalist Sharon Churcher ("Churcher") which was published in two British tabloids, described Maxwell's alleged role as someone who recruited or facilitated the recruitment

t balancing of the conflicting principles described below. I. Prior Proceedings In early 2011 , in an interview with journalist Sharon Churcher ("Churcher") which was published in two British tabloids, described Maxwell's alleged role as someone who recruited or facilitated the recruitment of young fe

issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power" and "the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts." See id.; Stern v. Cosby, 529 F.Supp.2d 417, 420 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (internal citations omitted) ("the court must determine the weight of the presumption, that is, whe

g the grant of summary judgment.”); cf. Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under R

bmit this Declaration in support of Ms. Maxwell’s Motion for Summary Judgment.’ 2. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an article by Sharon Churcher entitled “Prince Andrew and the 17-year-old girl his sex offender flew to Britain to meet him,” DAILY MAIL, dated March 2, 2011. ' At trial, defend

and correct copy of a statement on behalf of Ms. Maxwell dated January 2, 2015. 3. Attached as Exhibit B 1s a true and correct copy of an article by Sharon Churcher titled “Teenage girl recruited by paedophile Jeffrey Epstein reveals how she twice met Bill Clinton,” DAILY MAIL, dated March 5, 2011. HOUSE_OVERSI

ying amendment where “addition of more plaintiffs .. . would not have affected the issues underlying the grant of summary judgment.”’); cf. Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under Rule 15, “courts have held that leave to amend to assert a claim already at issue in [another lawsuit