Epstein Secrets

handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning

t's defamation. 3 I'm going to move on to point number 9. Ms. 4 seeks to exclude any alleged criminal history from coming into 5 this case. And the Federal Rules of Evidence bar the 6 introduction of this evidence, full stop. 7 As the Court is aware, the only way criminal history 8 could come into evidence is through Rule 609

handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning

defendant's defamation. I'm going to move on to point number 9. Ms. seeks to exclude any alleged criminal history from coming into this case. And the Federal Rules of Evidence bar the introduction of this evidence, full stop. As the Court is aware, the only criminal history could come into evidence is through Rule 609, but that

tness in the case. As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, she's planning to call Mr. Dershowitz. Mr. Dershowitz is going to say Ms. Boylan told him that Ms. Giuffre told him something, and so we have the classic hearsay within a hearsay situation. The problem, of course, is that Boylan

ant's defamation. I'm going to move on to point number 9. Ms. Giuffre seeks to exclude any alleged criminal history from coming into this case. And the Federal Rules of Evidence bar the introduction of this evidence, full stop. As the Court is aware, the only way criminal history could come into evidence is through Rule 609, but th