Epstein Secrets

g is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19)... eee 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion 1n Limine 20)... ceececesessseeseeceeeeseeneeceseeseeneeeeeerseeeaees 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Prematu

preclusion of all documents and discussion of the Jane Doe 102 case, including the settlement of those claim

nt and admissible (Motion in Limine 19).................00. 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion in Limine 20)... ccccccccccceceeceeeceseeesecneesseesteeesaeenes 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Premature an

ceceseccecusececusseccsssecesssseescsseeeceseesenssseeestsssessnsaseess 25 17. The Parties agree to preclusion of all documents and discussion of the Jane Doe 102 case, including the settlement of those claims (Motion in Limine 17) ................0005 26 18. The Cassell/Edwards v. Dershowitz litigation is

handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning

. 17 As your Honor is well aware, the triggering event in this case 18 was when Ms. then known as Jane Doe Number 3, filed a 19 motion to join Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 in the Florida pro 20 bono Crime Victims Rights action. 21 Now, Judge Marra denied that motion to join, but at 22 the same time

handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning

17 As your Honor is well aware, the triggering event in this case 18 was when Ms. , then known as Jane Doe Number 3, filed a 19 motion to join Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 in the Florida pro 20 bono Crime Victims Rights action. 21 Now, Judge Marra denied that motion to join, but at 22 the same time

tness in the case. As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, she's planning to call Mr. Dershowitz. Mr. Dershowitz is going to say Ms. Boylan told him that Ms. Giuffre told him something, and so we have the classic hearsay within a hearsay situation. The problem, of course, is that Boylan

motion. As your Honor is well aware, the triggering event in this case was when Ms. Giuffre, then known as Jane Doe Number 3, filed a motion to join Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 in the Florida pro bono Crime Victims Rights action. Now, Judge Marra denied that motion to join, but at the same time he said, "Th