Epstein Secrets

7 Mich. App. 1, 12, 602 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1999)... eee 13 Longmire v. Ala. State Univ., 151 F.R.D. 414, 419 (M.D.Ala. 1992)... cece ee eee ee ee eee 3 Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc., No. 07 C 1763, 2012 WL 379904, at *4 (N.D. IIL Feb. 6, 2012) oo eeeeseseessesscssenecrscsecseesecsesessesesseseesses

essment rere memeneistseee 13, 28 S.E.C. v. Collins & Aikman Corp., 256 F.R.D. 403, 412 (S.D.N-Y. 2009) oo. ceeeeeecesteeteeteeeeeeeees 19 Schafer v. Time, Inc., 142 F.3d 1361, 1364-75 (1 1th Cir. 1998) oo. eee ceseesseesseeeseeeseeeseeeneessaee 3 Seligson, Morris & Neuburger v Fairbanks Whitney Corp., 257 N

ss'n, 237 Mich. App. 1, 12, 602 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1999)... 13 Longmire v. Ala. State Univ., 151 F.R.D. 414, 419 (M.D.Ala. 1992). 000.00. cece cee ed Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc., No. 07 C 1763, 2012 WL 379904, at *4 (N.D. ILL. Feb. 6, 2012) oe ceecceececcecccecceseeecesecsecseeceeeseesecseesaec

2015 WL 3533844, at *5 (D. Utah i eb) 13,28 S.E.C. v. Collins & Aikman Corp., 256 F.R.D. 403, 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) oo. cccccteeeseeeee 19 Schafer v. Time, Inc., 142 F.3d 1361, 1364-75 (11th Cir. 1998) oo ccceeeeeseteeteesetseteeteesenes 3 Seligson, Morris & Neuburger v Fairbanks Whitney Corp., 257 N.Y.S.2d

against 10 him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's 11 statements against my client. 12 The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, 13 goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have 14 to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. 15 And s

no reason we should be allowed to ask about all these 14 other bad acts. 15 Sack cites, your Honor, to an Eleventh Circuit case, 16 Schafer vs. Time, Inc. In that case, your Honor, Sack says the 17 Eleventh Circuit found the district court had been correct when 18 it ruled that the defendant, which

y my client against him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's statements against my client. The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. And so, your Hono

no reason we should be allowed to ask about all these 14 other bad acts. 15 Sack cites, your Honor, to an Eleventh Circuit case, 16 Schafer vs. Time, Inc. In that case, your Honor, Sack says the 17 Eleventh Circuit found the district court had been correct when 18 it ruled that the defendant, which

by my client against him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's statements against my client. The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. And so, your Hono

ere is just no reason we should be allowed to ask about all these other bad acts. Sack cites, your Honor, to an Eleventh CircuLt case, Schafer vs. Time, Inc. In that case, your Honor, Sack says the Eleventh Circuit found the district court had been correct when it ruled that the defendant, which allegedl