Epstein Secrets

l has expired. Dated: May ,f, 2010 SO ORDERED. Lawrence M. McKenna U.S.D.J. 3 Persons other than Jane D

e counsel a copy of the interview recording. (Id. 1 8.) Mr. Rush subsequently corrected the date of the interview to "prior to October 22, 2009." (Rush Supp. Aff., Apr. 30, 2010 [Carroll Reply Decl., May 3, 2010, Ex. C) 1 2.) At the outset of the interview, Mr Epstein said that it was off-the-record, a

appeal has expired. SO ORDERED. 14 ‘—`---- .4, Lawrence M. McKenna O.S.D.J. 3 Persons other than Jane D

e counsel a copy of the interview recording. (Id. I 8.) Mr. Rush subsequently corrected the date of the interview to "prior to October 22, 2009." (Rush Supp. Aff., Apr. 30, 2010 [Carroll Reply Decl., May 3, 2010, Ex. C] I 2.) At the outset of the interview, Mr Epstein said that it was off-the-record, a

d 833 (3d Dep't 1997) Fraser v. Park Newspapers Lawrence Inc., 257..2d 961, 684 .2d 332 (3d Dep't 1999)

on a digital recording device. Id. During the interview, Epstein made no material admissions regarding the young women suing him for sexual abuse. Rush Supp. Aff. ¶¶ 4-5. So too, because the interview took place months before Epstein filed the Ponzi Scheme Action (and before Rothstein was even publicly