Epstein Secrets

f New York 34 EFTA00073103 1974 University of Oregon University of Kansas Washington Defense Counsel, Seattle 1975 University of Lethbridge Kansas State University Evergreen State College University of Wisconsin, Madison Lawrence University Harvard University New School for Social Research Washington State

A American Judges Association Annual Meeting SAFECO Insurance Company Continuing Education Program Law and Society Assn, Univ of Minnesota 1979 California State University, Chico Carnegie-Mellon University Yale University (one week) Duke University University of California, Santa Barbara California State University

speaker) Emory University, Atlanta University of Texas, Austin National Child Abuse Defense & Resource Center, 5th Internat Conf, Las Vegas, NV Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Nebraska Psychological Association, Omaha Washington University, St. Louis Exploratorium (Science Museum), San Francisco National In

er, B.L. & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Jury selection in major controlled substance trials: The need for extended voir dire. Forensic Reports, 3, 331-348. Christianson, S-A. & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Some characteristics of peoples' traumatic memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(3), 195-198. Jobe, J. Whi

J., & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Determining damages: The influence of expert testimony on jurors' decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 385-395. Christianson, S., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Eyewitness testimony. In Eysenck, M. (Ed.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Cognitive Psychology. Oxford, U.K.:

tional university: 'Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis. 'Department of Psychology, Pities College. 'Department of Psychology, California State University, Las Angeles; and ^Derailment of Psychology. California State University. Sacramento Psycholopc.al Science I -I6 0 The Authors) LOIS AnKle reuse

der the relation of the event to one's life course (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006; Frankenhuis & Weenh, 2013); the emotional or taboo nature of the acts (Christianson, 1992; Goodman et al., 1990); meta-cognitive abilities (Koriat et al., 2000), especially in relation to schema-expected, plausible acts (Pezdek et

opardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of chiklren's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10180- 000 Christianson, S. A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309. Connolly, I). A., Chong, K., Cobur

Alexander,' Jodi A. Quas,2 Gail S. GotsImams Simone Gheiti," Robin S. Edelstein,3 Allison D. ReAllich,3 Ingrid M. Cordon,3 and David P.H. Jones(' ! California State University; Sacramento; 2Univenity of California, Irvine; 'University of California, Davis; 4Research Institute on. Judicial Systems, National Research Council

aps because of their salience or distinctiveness. They may activate physiological (e.g., amygrIala; LeDoux, 2000) and behavioral (e.g., rehearsal; Christianson, 1992) responses that help con- solidate or maintain memories, possibly including memories for whole categories of experiences. Moreover, for highly