Epstein Secrets

or_review/black_chamber.shtml. “Its far-seeking eyes”: Kahn, Codebreakers, 358. The NSA also organized: Woodward, Veil, 471-75. In 1980, President Ronald Reagan: David R. Shedd, “How Obama Unilaterally Chilled Surveillance,” Wall Street Journal, Nov. 30, 2015. “We are approaching”: Turner, Secrecy and Democr

oodward, Veil, 471-75. In 1980, President Ronald Reagan: David R. Shedd, “How Obama Unilaterally Chilled

CHAPTER 16 The Question of When 156 “The NSA was actually”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden on Cyber Warfare.” 156 The career of the KGB mole: Bagley, Spy Wars, 46. | | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 319 @ 9/30/16 8:13AM | | HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019807 320 | Notes to pages 159-171 157 A counteres

13AM | | HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019816 Selected Bibliography SELECTED BOOKS Andrew, Christopher. The Sword and the Shield. New York: Basic Books, 2000. Bagley, Tennent H. Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2008. Bamford, James. The Puzzle Palace. Boston:

9, 30, 31 United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, (1996) passim United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249 (2d Cir. 1998) 19, 25 United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985) 7 United States v. Barcelo, 628 F. App'x 36 (2d Cir. 2015) 19 United States v. Bass, 536 U.S. 862 (2002) 30, 33 United Sta

argument regarding selective prosecution before a jury because the "selective prosecution defense is an issue for the court rather than the jury." Regan, 103 F.3d at 1082. The Second Circuit's directive makes sense. A claim of improper prosecutorial motive, whatever its ground or grounds, "is not a d

9, 30, 31 United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, (1996) passim United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249 (2d Cir. 1998) 19, 25 United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985) 7 United States v. Barcelo, 628 F. App'x 36 (2d Cir. 2015) 19 United States v. Bass, 536 U.S. 862 (2002) 30, 33 United Sta

argument regarding selective prosecution before a jury because the "selective prosecution defense is an issue for the court rather than the jury." Regan, 103 F.3d at 1082. The Second Circuit's directive makes sense. A claim of improper prosecutorial motive, whatever its ground or grounds, "is not a d