5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211,
W.D.N.Y.1974), are particularly relevant to the case at hand. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce
quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211,
W.D.N.Y.1974), are particularly relevant to the case at hand. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce
quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Nonhwest, 441 U.S. 211,
W.D.N.Y.1974). are particularly relevant to the ease at band. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce
quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211,
W.D.N.Y.1974), are particularly relevant to the case at hand. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce
quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest. 441 U.S. 211,
W.D.N.Y.I974), are particularly relevant to the case at hand. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce
Entities connected to both Michael Douglas and State Department of Taxation

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
New York
LOCATION
Paul Ryan
PERSON
Oliver Stone
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSONCollins
PERSON
FedEx
ORGANIZATION
Louisiana
LOCATION
United Kingdom
LOCATION
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON