Epstein Secrets

h politicians and other public figures — such as President Obama, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, and Pope

ts of the nuclear deal with Iran — from President Barack Obama on down — have marshaled a powerful attack

w, as if to hammer nail into coffin, comes Cheney — angrily questioning "the veracity of the president's claims" about the deal and labeling several Obama assertions "simply false." A lecture on veracity and falsehood from the man who asserted before the Iraq invasion that Saddam Hussein had reconstit

neoconservatives are never right. Inline image 1 EFTA00846373 Over the past few weeks, proponents of the nuclear deal with Iran — from President Barack Obama on down — have marshaled a powerful attack on some of the deal's most prominent opponents. Specifically, they've been pointing out an indisputable

g Iraq in 2003, but nonetheless be correct to oppose the nuclear deal with Iran today. None of us is infallible, and it is at least conceivable that Bill Kristol, Elliott Abrams, James Woolsey, Fred Hiatt, Max Boot, et al. could have blown it big-time in 2002 - but be absolutely right this time around. Conc

_=?WINDOWS- 1252?Q?ge=5FTWP_Editorial_Board=5FFebruary_1,2013.pdf?=; Neil_Young.pdf Dear Friends.... This week the GOP launched a new attack on the Obama administration when Senate Republicans promised to block Richard Cadre, President Obama's pick to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The

the best way to deal with this problem is by growing the economy with a jobs program. This week The New Republic published a revealing interview — Barack Obama is Not Pleased — by Franklin Foer and Chris Hughes with President Obama who described the strategic choice that he believes faces the Republican pa

ate Republicans promised to block Richard Cadre, President Obama's pick to head the Consumer Financial Protection

he New Republic published a revealing interview — Barack Obama is Not Pleased — by Franklin Foer and Chri

the economy in the way that the country was able to do in the 1950s and 1960s. This week joining the growing choir of Chris Cristie, Bobby Jindal, Bill Kristol and even Paul Ryan, David Brooks wrote an opt-ed in the New York Times — A Second G.O.P. - suggesting that the Republican Party needs to reinvent i

homeini or George W. Bush or Noun al-Maliki, but Barack Obama. I often agree with Elliott, but I could no

d Ignatius Article 3. YaleGlobal As Conflict Grows in Middle East, US-Saudi Gulf Widens Fahad Nazer Article 4. Atlantic Monthly No, President Obama Did Not Break the Middle East Jeffrey Goldberg Article 5. The Atlantic Obama's Disastrous Iraq Policy: An Autopsy Peter Beinart Article 6. The

Man Who Broke the Middle East." The man in question is not Sykes or Picot or Nasser or Saddam or Khomeini or George W. Bush or Noun al-Maliki, but Barack Obama. I often agree with Elliott, but I could not let this one go by without a response. Don't worry. This won't take long. Here is Elliott's thesis: T

s Fahad Nazer Article 4. Atlantic Monthly No, President Obama Did Not Break the Middle East Jeffrey Goldberg

to care deeply. In recent days, many liberals have rushed to Obama's defense simply because they are so galled to hear people like Dick Cheney and Bill Kristol lecturing anyone on Iraq. That's a mistake. While far less egregious than George W. Bush's errors, Obama's have been egregious enough. By ignoring

nce, but the stream of claims of innocence by American media a=d politicians who supported him are acts of shameless con artistry at best= </=pan> Obama Rejected Keystone XL Pipeline Afte= 7 Years Of Review And might not the Lauded Success=Environments Claim 7 EFTA_R1_00006483 EFTA01732888 </=pa

opula=, not least with Republican voters. A Republican president could unl=ash disastrous new wars of choice, like George W. Bush's war in Ir=q and Barack Obama's war in Libya. But the neoconservative dream of a benign Pax Americana, in which China, Russia and other powers tre=ble before the might of Uncle Sam

doing victory laps as a r=sult that two weeks ago President Obama finally decide to not approve the =,600-mile, 57

of choice, like George W. Bush's war in Ir=q and Barack Obama's war in Libya. But the neoconservative dre

eagan brain truster James Pinkerton wrot= of a "new paradigm" that would accept the need for=government but make it more flexible. David Brooks and Bill Kristol =ailed for "national greatness conservatism" in the =radition of Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt. A more populist alternative=was offered by Pat Buchana

n of a military strike. Despite this internal Israeli split, Republican candidate Mitt Romney has strongly endorsed Netanyahu and chided President Obama for taking an independent U.S. position, saying at a campaign rally Monday: "The president throwing Bibi Netanyahu under the bus was totally unacce

king before the November elections. The last thing Netanyahu wants is a reelected and angry American president. Sure, Netanyahu doesn't want to see Barack Obama reelected at all. But the one way to guarantee that would be to strike before the elections. There's probably no way America could stay out, depen

omney has strongly endorsed Netanyahu and chided President Obama for taking an independent U.S. position, saying

n president. Sure, Netanyahu doesn't want to see Barack Obama reelected at all. But the one way to guara

to support it—and send an unmistakable message to the ayatollahs. This path was suggested here in THE WEEKLY STANDARD early July, by Jamie Fly and Bill Kristol, and this is the moment to move forward with it. Like the joint resolutions for the Gulf Wars in 1991 and in 2002 and the joint resolution passed a

conomic discontent is at an all-time high. The electorate wants economic change NOW. But, then there’s Hillary Clinton’s take on the economy and the Obama record. Like Pat Buchanan’s protectionist niche some 20 years ago, there is a segment of America that truly likes the Obama record. But, that segment

rm lawyer, First Lady, Senator from New York, and President Obama’s Secretary of State. She has been indefatigably

of Clinton is profoundly damaging to the Democrats’ prospects, while the Republicans have just chosen their candidate. Someone ought to tell that to Bill Kristol. What is patently obvious from the rise of Bernie Sanders and the massive, hard fought battle in the Republican primary is that economic discontent

eg you to look at carefully are the virtually identical precipitous drops in the economy immediately preceding the Presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama and the totally opposite results during their respective Presidencies. | just can’t see how a pro-Obama candidate can win in 2016. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_0

on of a military strike. Despite this internal Israeli split, Republican candidate Mitt Romney has strongly endorsed Netanyahu and chided President Obama for taking an independent U.S. position, saying at a campaign rally Monday: "The president throwing Bibi Netanyahu under the bus was totally unacce

king before the November elections. The last thing Netanyahu wants is a reelected and angry American president. Sure, Netanyahu doesn't want to see Barack Obama reelected at all. But the one way to guarantee that would be to strike before the elections. There's probably no way America could stay out,

omney has strongly endorsed Netanyahu and chided President Obama for taking an independent U.S. position, saying

to support it—and send an unmistakable message to the ayatollahs. This path was suggested here in THE WEEKLY STANDARD early July, by Jamie Fly and Bill Kristol, and this is the moment to move forward with it. Like the joint resolutions for the Gulf Wars in 1991 and in 2002 and the joint resolution passed a