Epstein Secrets

ive to a wide variety of conservative celebrities, including, over the years, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and various Fox News stars. The year before Obama’s reelection, Trump fell into this category. But he was viewed quite differently four years later. In the winter of 2016, during the still competitiv

. There was video documenting the attack and substantial agreement among intelligence agencies about Assad’s responsibility. The politics were right: Barack Obama failed to act when confronted with a Syrian chemical attack, and now Trump could. The downside was small; it would be a contained response. And it ha

court earlier. ANEW LOW! (4:49 a.m.) How low has President Obama gone to tap my phones during the very sacred elec

athering of conservative movement activists, which had outgrown the accommodations of Washington hotels and moved to the Gaylord Resort on Maryland’s National Harbor waterfront. CPAC, right of right-of-center and trying to hold steady there, ambivalent about all the conservative vectors that further diverged from

g, and it is huge=y disconcerting. It would also be a major escalation from the electronic s=rveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough. Obama political ap=ointees rampantly "unmasked" Trump campaign officials to m=nitor their conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillanc=

rtical-align:baselincline-height:20=x">House Intelligence Com=ittee Chairman Devin Nunes at the Conservative Political Action Conference= Feb. 24 at National Harbor, Md. PHOTO: JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS <https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/CbOYtO6vp=s-PuPIW-jWDeBwTgECS99UP5REDMADuUbH3Ez- U7C475MqlsAKM389rbu7B7

g, and it is hugely disconcerting. It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough. Obama political appointees rampantly "unmasked" Trump campaign officials to monitor their conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillance

/im-10205?width=620&aspect_ratio=1.5> House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes at the Conservative Political Action Conference, Feb. 24 at National Harbor, Md. PHOTO: JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS <https://s.wsj.net/img/renocol_KimStrassel.gif> By Kimberley A. Strassel May 10, 2018 6:50 p.m. ET 1663 COMME

pying against the 2016 Trump campaign? House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes at the Conservative Political Action Conference, Feb. 24 at National Harbor, Md. PHOTO: JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020818 --- PAGE BREAK --- By Kimberley A. Strassel May 10, 2018 6:50 p.m. ET 1663 COMMENTS e

ng, and it is hugely disconcerting. It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough. Obama political appointees rampantly “unmasked” Trump campaign officials to monitor their conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillance w

pying against the 2016 Trump campaign? House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes at the Conservative Political Action Conference, Feb. 24 at National Harbor, Md. PHOTO: JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021109 --- PAGE BREAK --- By Kimberley A. Strassel May 10, 2018 6:50 p.m. ET 1663 COMMENTS o

ng, and it is hugely disconcerting. It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough. Obama political appointees rampantly “unmasked” Trump campaign officials to monitor their conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillance w