Epstein Secrets

after the Fund self-reported the issues in 2006. At the conclusion of its investigation, the SEC elected not to charge Mr. Zwirn or any of the other Zwirn Parties with any wrongdoing, but charged Mr. Gruss with aiding and abetting violations of the Investment Advisers Act for knowingly misusing his au

COUNTERCLAIMS 42 A. Jeepers Has No Claim for Promissory Estoppel Because There Was No Promise 42 B. Jeepers Has No Claim for Fraud Because Mr. Zwirn Fully Disclosed All Accounting Irregularities and Made No Misrepresentations to Mr. Epstein 43 C. Jeepers's Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty o

JUDICIAL ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SERVICE NEW YORK, NEW YORK IN THE MATTER OF FORTRESS VRF I LLC and FORTRESS VALUE RECOVERY FUND I LLC, Claimants v. JEEPERS, INC

ns of the Zwim Fund, after Zwim spun off his business from DSAM (then known as Highbridgc Capital Management, LLC), 1 helped introduce investors to Zwirn, invested my personal and family foundation assets with Zwirn, and my firm allocated assets of Highbridgc Capital Corporation ("I-TCC") to an accou

JUDICIAL ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SERVICE NEW YORK, NEW YORK FORTRESS VRF I LLC and FORTRESS VALUE RECOVERY FUND I LLC, Claimants, v. JEEPERS, INC. Respondents,

my personal and family foundation assets with Zwim, and my firm allocated assets of iiighbridge Capital Corporation ("HCC) to an account managed by Zwirn's company which was also the investment manager of the Zwim Fund. 3. One of the early investors that I introduced to Zwim was Jeffrey Epstein ("E

JUDICIAL ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SERVICE NEW YORK, NEW YORK FORTRESS VRF I LLC and FORTRESS VALUE RECOVERY FUND I LLC, Claimants, v. JEEPERS, INC. Respondents,

ations concerning their withdrawal requests, and never documented the promise in any of their communications with any Third-Party Respondent. Also, Zwirn's disclosures to investors were neither misrepresentations, misleading nor negligent. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 3. Epstein communicated to the Fun

JUDICIAL ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SERVICE NEW YORK, NEW YORK FORTRESS VRF I LLC and FORTRESS VALUE RECOVERY FUND I LLC, Claimants, v. JEEPERS, INC. Respondents,

ation. Without limiting the foregoing, Highbridge shall not produce any documents exchanged by the parties in connection with the matter entitled Zwirn v. Corbin Capital Partners, L.P. et al., Index No. 08/603382. Objections to Definitions 1. Highbridge objects to the Definitions to the extent th

JUDICIAL ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SERVICE NEW YORK, NEW YORK FORTRESS VRF I LLC and FORTRESS VALUE RECOVERY FUND I LLC, Claimants, - against - JEEPERS, INC., Respo