Epstein Secrets

ivate parties or the general public." Sells Engineering, 463 U.S. at 445; see In re Request for Access to Grand Jury Materials Grand Jury No. 81-1 (Hastings), 833 F.2d 1438, 1441 (116 Cir. 1987) ("the interests that underlie the policy of grand jury secrecy are implicated to a lesser degree when disclosu

in responding to the OPR investigation, Villafana secured the representation of Jonathan Biran, a partner at Baker Donelson in Washington, DC. Mr. Biran graduated from Stanford Law School in 1993 and clerked for the Hon. David F. Levi at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

n case, and she panic of the non-prosecution agreement, efforts to ensure comp cisions concerning victim notifications (4/2/2019 Ragsdale ltr to Biran at 1). 14. as then instructed, through counsel, to answer a total of 17 questions, with an additional six subparts, on a number of topics (id.). S

ivate parties or the general public." Sells Engineering, 463 U.S. at 445; see hr re Request for Access to Grand Jury Materials Grand Jury No. 81-1 (Hastings), 833 F.2d 1438, 1441 (11°1Cir. 1987) ("the interests that underlie the policy of grand jury secrecy affected implicated to a lesser degree when dis

in responding to the OPR investigation, I secured the services of Jonathan Biran, a partner at Baker Donelson in Washington, DC, as my counsel. Mr. Biran graduated from Stanford Law School in 1993 and clerked with me for the Hon. David F. Levi at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Ca

ion of the non-prosecution agreement, efforts to ensure compliance with it, and decisions concerning victim notifications (4/2/2019 Ragsdale ltr to Biran at 1). 15. I was then instructed, through counsel, to answer a total of 17 questions, with an additional six subparts, on a number of topics (id.)

erations validly before a jury, and finally, as a remedy designed to deter illegal conduct.' Coke, 2011 WL 3738969, at *6 (quoting United States v. Hastings, 461 U.S. 499, 505 (1983)). "However, while there are times when a district court may properly find it absolutely necessary[, in order] to preserve

procedures or exceptions provided in the [confidentiality] orders." Id. Here, by contrast, ga on in late 0111 Schiller shortly the na in Februan Miran order, Aside from rank speculation loosely premised on an anonymously sourced news report, the defendant offers nothing to support her assertion th