Epstein Secrets

ns of the state in which the suit was filed. See Lincoln Prop. Co.' Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 126 S.Ct. 606, 61

cked jurisdiction on removal. Id. (citing Parks, The New York Times Co., 308 F.2d 474, 478 (5th Cir.1962); Cowart Iron Works, Inc.. Phillips Constr. Co., Inc., 507 F.Supp. 740, 744 (S.D. Ga. 1981)). Here, Defendants argue that removal is proper because Plaintiff cannot state a cause of action against Def

ns of the state in which the suit was filed. See Lincoln Prop. Co.'. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 126 S.Ct. 606, 6

ked jurisdiction on removal. Id. (citing Parks'. The New York Times Co., 308 F.2d 474, 478 (5th Cir.1962); Cowan Iron Works, Inc.'. Phillips Constr. Co., Inc., 507 F.Supp. 740, 744 (S.D. Ga. 1981)). Here, Defendants argue that removal is proper because Plaintiff cannot state a cause of action against Def

ockbuster, Inc. v. White, 819 So. 2d 43, 44 (Ala. 2001)) (internal quotation marks and other citations omitted); accord Woods Knoll, LLC v. City of Lincoln, Ala., 548 F. App'x 577, 581 (11th Cir. 2013). For internal use only SDNY_GM_00056911 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.ctON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-

icited under these circumstances of confidence, Alabama courts will treat the statement as a fact reasonably relied upon. Id. Kaye v. Pawnee Const. Co., Inc., 680 F.2d 1360, 1367-68 (11th Cir. 1982) (footnote omitted); see Bryant Bank, 155 So. 3d at 239-40 (citing Kaye, 680 F.2d at 1368). As discussed ab

Susan Leslie Saltzstein Daniel John Toal Lynn Lincoln Sarko Rachel G Skaistis Robert Seth Hoff Chris

SAL WITH PREJUDICE x PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned counsel for all parties hereby stipulate and agree that this action, Financial MG( Co., Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Cos. Inc., No. 10 Civ. 01226 (RWS), is hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(I )(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules o