Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
udication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
ir. 2011) (holding that claims that are "based on events that may take place in the future" are to be "dismissed for lack of jurisdiction") (citing Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570, 1574 n.7 (1 1 th Cir. 1989) ("[R]ipeness goes to whether the district court had subject matter 13 Petitioners
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements ....'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
ir. 2011) (holding that claims that are "based on events that may take place in the future" are to be "dismissed for lack of jurisdiction") (citing Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570, 1574 n.7 (11th Cir. 1989) ("[R]ipeness goes to whether the district court had subject matter 13 Petitioners co
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements ....'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
ir. 2011) (holding that claims that are "based on events that may take place in the future" are to be "dismissed for lack of jurisdiction") (citing Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570, 1574 n.7 (11th Cir. 1989) ("[R]ipeness goes to whether the district court had subject matter 13 Petitioners co
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements ....'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
ir. 2011) (holding that claims that are "based on events that may take place in the future" are to be "dismissed for lack of jurisdiction") (citing Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570, 1574 n.7 (11th Cir. 1989) ("[R]ipeness goes to whether the district court had subject matter 13 Petitioners co
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
udication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
ir. 2011) (holding that claims that are "based on events that may take place in the future" are to be "dismissed for lack of jurisdiction") (citing Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570, 1574 n.7 (11th Cir. 1989) ("[R]ipeness goes to whether the district court had subject matter 13 Petitioners co
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
udication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
ir. 2011) (holding that claims that are "based on events that may take place in the future" are to be "dismissed for lack of jurisdiction") (citing Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570, 1574 n.7 (11th Cir. 1989) ("[R]ipeness goes to whether the district court had subject matter 13 Petitioners co
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00010480
udication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
Page: EFTA00010480 →Page EFTA00010486
ir. 2011) (holding that claims that are "based on events that may take place in the future" are to be "dismissed for lack of jurisdiction") (citing Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570, 1574 n.7 (1 1 th Cir. 1989) ("[R]ipeness goes to whether the district court had subject matter 13 Petitioners
Page: EFTA00010486 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (147)
Entities connected to both Atlanta and Greenbriar, Ltd.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON860 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Greenbriar,
United States
LOCATION249 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Greenbriar,
Phoenix
LOCATION213 w/ Atlanta·6 w/ Greenbriar,
Marc Rich
PERSON185 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION175 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON133 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Greenbriar,
New York
LOCATION131 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON122 w/ Atlanta·6 w/ Greenbriar,
FBI
ORGANIZATION115 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Greenbriar,
George Mitchell
PERSON120 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
Colorado
LOCATION119 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
Samantha Power
PERSON112 w/ Atlanta·6 w/ Greenbriar,
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON100 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
DB
Doug Band
PERSON88 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
Bradley Edwards
PERSON83 w/ Atlanta·5 w/ Greenbriar,
Jacksonville
LOCATION73 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Greenbriar,
Bernie Sanders
PERSON75 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
the Southern District
LOCATION66 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Greenbriar,
Harry Reid
PERSON69 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Greenbriar,
Alexander Acosta
PERSON54 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Greenbriar,