Epstein Secrets

ONS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF RULE 45 Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON. MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 EFTA00605112 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 228 Filed 06/20/16 Page 2 of 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROU

extra time to take these six depositions. The only witnesses for whom depositions should be permitted following the discovery cut-off are: (1) Ms. Sharon Churcher, Plaintiff's friend, advocate and former journalist with the Daily Mail, who filed a Motion to Quash her subpoena on the day before her scheduled d

re for trial. Thus, if the Court grants Plaintiff's motion, the remaining deadlines in the Scheduling Order ought to be extended accordingly. 2 Ms. Churcher's motion to quash will be heard this Thursday by the Court. Ms. Maxwell is filing simultaneously with this Response a Motion to Re-Open Plaintiffs D

10590 Tel: 914-763-8333 [email protected] Defoulanes [dal Counsel: Laura Menninger: Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Tel: 303-831-7364 Fax: 303-832-2628 [email protected] Jeffrey Pagliuca: Haddon Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den

llegations. Prince Andrew is an example. Disclosing her story publicly for the first time in March 2011 in an "exclusive" relationship with reporter Sharon Churcher, plaintiff had every incentive and opportunity to tell her entire story honestly and completely. She told Churcher she 5 EFTA00792760 did not ha

relationship with reporter Sharon Churcher, plaintiff had every incentive and opportunity to tell her entire story honestly and completely. She told Churcher she 5 EFTA00792760 did not have sex with Prince Andrew. Less than four years later, after engaging a lawyer, plaintiff alleged she was "forced"

South Salem, NY 10590 Tel: Defendant's Trial Counsel: Laura Menninger: Jeffrey Pagliuca: Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Tel: Fax: Haddon Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Tel: Fax: EFTA00617397 Ty Gee: Haddon, Morgan an

llegations. Prince Andrew is an example. Disclosing her story publicly for the first time in March 2011 in an "exclusive" relationship with reporter Sharon Churcher, plaintiff had every incentive and opportunity to tell her entire story honestly and completely. She told Churcher she 5 EFTA00617400 did not ha

relationship with reporter Sharon Churcher, plaintiff had every incentive and opportunity to tell her entire story honestly and completely. She told Churcher she 5 EFTA00617400 did not have sex with Prince Andrew. Less than four years later, after engaging a lawyer, plaintiff alleged she was "forced"

Email:[email protected] DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Jeffrey S. Pagliuca [PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO] Haddon Morgan and Foreman 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO, USA 80203 (303)-831-7364 Fax: (303)-832-2628 Email:[email protected] Laura A. Menninger [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Haddon, Morgan and Forema

s. Inc.,: Daily News, L.P. Intervenor: Michael Cernovich d/b/a Cernovich Media; Alan M. Dershowitz Material Witness: Miscellaneous: Respondent: Sharon Churcher; Jeffrey Epstein DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:15cv7433 OTHER DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:17mc00025 U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 17-01625 FILING DAT

lt Lake City, UT 84112, By: Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell: HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C., 150 East 10th Avenue, Denver, CO 80203, By: Laura A. Menninger, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq., Ty Gee, Esq. Counsel for Intervenor Michael Cemovich: RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLL

ed on the difficult balancing of the conflicting principles described below. I. Prior Proceedings In early 2011 , in an interview with journalist Sharon Churcher ("Churcher") which was published in two British tabloids, described Maxwell's alleged role as someone who recruited or facilitated the recruitment

t balancing of the conflicting principles described below. I. Prior Proceedings In early 2011 , in an interview with journalist Sharon Churcher ("Churcher") which was published in two British tabloids, described Maxwell's alleged role as someone who recruited or facilitated the recruitment of young fe

k ew or 0007 Re: Au 3, 2020 Order (Doc. 1096) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P C Laura A. Menninger Denver, Colorado 80203 wvow.hmilaw.com Dear Judge Preska: I write in response to the Court's Order of August 3, 2020 (Doc. 1069), the Order and Protocol

ntiff's Brief in Support of the Privilege Claimed for In Camera Submission • 155 — Defendant's Motion to Compel Non-Privileged Documents • 215 - Sharon Churcher Motion to Quash Subpoena • 231 — Defendant's Motion to Reopen Deposition of Plaintiff Counsel for Ms. Maxwell is available for a telephone confere