Epstein Secrets

the conduct, which took place in that country, is a matter of Mexican, not US, law. Counsel to IMSS Maney & Gonzalez-Felix Partner Mark Maney in Houston Matthew John Valcourt in Miami Counsel to Stryker Miller Johnson Partners Andrew Portinga and David Gass in Grand Rapids, and associate Laci Rese

cant lack of uniformity in the DOJ's current approach to privilege reviews. But a recent Eleventh Circuit decision may lead to greater consistency. The Eleventh Circuit's Recent Decision In U.S. v. ICorf,[4] the Eleventh Circuit upheld the DOJ's use of a taint team to conduct a privilege review of materials seized fro

intended objective. Id. at 1287. Fact patterns similar to Murrell's exist in United States Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11 di Cir. 2004); United States Houston, 177 Fed. Aepx. 57 (11" Cir. 2006); Chilled States' Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193 (11* Cir. 2005); United States' Scott, 426 F. 3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2005); an

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"

intended objective. Id. at 1287. Fact patterns si ar to Murrell's exist in United States Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1326 (116 Cir. 2004); United States T Houston, 177 Fed. A x. 57 (11`b ir. 2006); United States I Searcy, 418 F.3d 193 (116 Cir. 2005); United States Scott, 426 F. 3d 1324 (II* Cir. 2005); and Un

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States, Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language

s intended objective. Id. at 1287. Fact patterns similar to Murrell's exist in United States Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11i6 Cir. 2004); United States Houston, 177 Fed. Ari,. 57 (11th Cir. 2006); United States! Searcy, 418 F.3d 193 (11th Cir. 2005); United States Scott, 426 F. 3d 1324 (116 Cir. 2005 ; and

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's' decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"

is intended objective. Id. at 1287. Fact patterns slat to Murrell's exist in Chatted States Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 2004); United States Houston, 177 Fed. Agpx. 57 (11* Cir. 2006); United States Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193 (Da Cir. 2005); United States' Scott, 426 F. 3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2005); and U

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in eases whcre there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"

nded objective. Id. at 1287. Fact patterns similar to Murrell's exist in United States u Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (1116 Cir. 2004); United States v. Houston, 177 Fed. Appx. 57 (1116 Cir. 2006); United States v. Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Scott, 426 F. 3d 1324 (II* Cir. 2005)

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. Muriel!, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Mum!! court wrote that, under the "plain language

nded objective. Id. at 1287. Fact patterns similar to Murrell's exist in United States v Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11t Cir. 2004); United States v. Houston, 177 Fed. Appx. 57 (11" Cir. 2006); United States v. Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193 (116 Cir. 2005); United States it Scott, 426 F. 3d 1324 (le' Cir. 2005);

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Mini! court wrote that, under the "plain language

to out his intended to Murrell's exist in United States Hotnaday, 392 dive. Id. at 1287. Fact patterns simr I 6 (11" Cir. 2004); United States Houston, 177 Fed. Appx. 57 (11th ir. 2006); Unite ales Seamy, 418 F.3d 1193 (II' Cir. 2005); United States Scott, 426 F. 3d 1324 (116 Cir. 2005 , and Uni

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"