Epstein Secrets

was provided by Fox News (09/06, Compton), WPTZ (NBC-5) (09/05, Guber & Hancox), Times Union (09/05, Munson), and VTDigger (09/05, Keays & Oliver). Hawaii Man Sentenced to Over Twenty Nine Years for Extortion, Drug Trafficking, and Firearm Charges Hoodline Honolulu (09/07, Liu) reported that David Borg

uding the FBI. Additional reporting on the story was provided by Al Jazeera (09/06, Staff Writer), BBC (09/06, Matza), CNN (09/06, Elassar, Rosales, Alvarado), Daily Mail (09/05, Potter), Fox News (09/05, Arcand), The Guardian (09/05, Staff Writer), Independent (09/06, Jin, Yang, et al.), Los Angeles Tim

venting supervisory em- ployees from unloading employer's product upon barges, involved conduct, policing of which was left wholly to territory of Hawaii in which alleged acts occurred. Rev.Laws Hawaii 1945, I§ 11120, 11570- 11584. 3. Courts 43=262.6(i) Mere proof of bad faith of prosecutors is not

nder our case law, failing to disclose evidence on which the court relied in sentencing may reiIt in a remand for resentencing. See United States Alvarado, 909 F.2d 1443, 1444-46 (10th Cir.I99 ). We agree with Mr. Rakes and the government that it would have been better for the district court to have

etween misdemeanor and 65 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d\(3) (2012)). °° Id. 67 Td. (citing United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 200 (4th Cir. 2006)). 68 Wayne R. LAFAVE ET AL., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 1.2(g), at 11 (Sth ed. 2009) (emphasis added). © OLC CVRA Righ

, 172-73 (2001). 1 Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 398 (1977) (quoting Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 2, 689 (1972)). 1© See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). 7 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 n.15 (citing Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363, 366 n.6 (D.C.

hts if counts are dismissed.**° Arizona courts have also permitted victims to invoke their rights in the context of civil forfeiture proceedings.”*! Hawaii’s victims’ rights statute illustrates how a state has defined the term “case” more expansively than the limited definition advocated by the Departmen

442 U.S. 330,339 (1979). 6 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 (quoting /8 U.S.C. § 3771(d)G) (2012)). 66 Td. 67 Id. (citing United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 200 (4th Cir. 2006)). 68 Wayne R. LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 1.2(g), at 11 (5th ed. 2009) (emphasis added). 6° OLC CVRA Rig

on also make clear that a later court hearing would start such a prosecution. For instance, in the Fourth Circuit case cited by OLC, United States v. Alvarado, the court reasons that "the main reason a law enforcement officer files [] a complaint is to establish probable cause for an arrest warrant. The cri

s if counts are dismissed. 73° Arizona courts have also permitted victims to invoke their rights in the context of civil forfeiture proceedings. 73! Hawaii's victims’ rights statute illustrates how a state has defined the term "case" more expansively than the limited definition advocated by the Departmen