4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
lly going on." Jane Doe No. 3 Aff. at 5-6. Compounding the confusion that the Government created through its letter, in 2011 FBI agents traveled to Sydney to interview Jane Doe No. 3. During that interview, they discussed her sexual abuse in Florida, giving the impression that criminal charges could st
Building on all these allegations, at the first hearing in this case, the Court allowed an additional victim — Jane Doe No. 2 — to join the action. See DE 115 (tr. July 11, 2008) at 14. The current motion for an amended pleading simply builds on that elaboration, naming two additional victims who were in t
lly going on." Jane Doe No. 3 Aff. at 5-6. Compounding the confusion that the Government created through its letter, in 2011 FBI agents traveled to Sydney to interview Jane Doe No. 3. During that interview, they discussed her sexual abuse in Florida, giving the impression that criminal charges could st
Building on all these allegations, at the first hearing in this case, the Court allowed an additional victim — Jane Doe No. 2 — to join the action. See DE 115 (tr. July 11, 2008) at 14. The current motion for an amended pleading simply builds on that elaboration, naming two additional victims who were in t
lly going on." Jane Doe No. 3 Aff. at 5-6. Compounding the confusion that the Government created through its letter, in 2011 FBI agents traveled to Sydney to interview Jane Doe No. 3. During that interview, they discussed her sexual abuse in Florida, giving the impression that criminal charges could st
Building on all these allegations, at the first hearing in this case, the Court allowed an additional victim — Jane Doe No. 2 — to join the action. See DE 115 (tr. July 11, 2008) at 14. The current motion for an amended pleading simply builds on that elaboration, naming two additional victims who were in t
lly going on." Jane Doe No. 3 Aff. at 5-6. Compounding the confusion that the Government created through its letter, in 2011 FBI agents traveled to Sydney to interview Jane Doe No. 3. During that interview, they discussed her sexual abuse in Florida, giving the impression that criminal charges could st
Building on all these allegations, at the first hearing in this case, the Court allowed an additional victim — Jane Doe No. 2 — to join the action. See DE 115 (tr. July I 1, 2008) at 14. The current motion for an amended pleading simply builds on that elaboration, naming two additional victims who were in
Entities connected to both Sydney and See DE 115

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
James Baker
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONBloom
PERSON
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATIONFISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATIONLeighton Allenby
PERSONGrand Lodge of Pennsylvania
ORGANIZATIONBank & Trust Co.
ORGANIZATIONFirestone Tire & Rubber Co.
ORGANIZATIONE.D. Ark. 1993
ORGANIZATIONSupport of Motion for Joinder
ORGANIZATION