Epstein Secrets

tend that judicial estoppel does not apply to them because the government has not established one of the elements of the three-part test examined in Tampa Bay Water v. HDR Engineering, Inc., 731 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir. 2013). D.E. 416 at 60. Specifically, petitioners contend the government has not demons

Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. el.I.LULLICyJ LU1 J CMG LUC tuna Janc A-ivy Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard,

h, Florida, on Monday, May 23, 2016. 2. One complication that has arisen in completing the mediation is that Jane Doe 1 is currently being held in Tampa, Florida, in the Orient Road Jail, in regard to allegations pending against her. Jane Doe 1 has pled not guilty to those charges, which are awaiting

he foregoing document was served on April 15, 2016, on the following using the Court's CMIECF system: Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf Attorneys for Jeff Epstein Is/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards 4 EFTA00211613

tend that judicial estoppel does not apply to them because the government has not established one of the elements of the three-part test examined in Tampa Bay Water v. HDR Engineering, Inc., 731 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir. 2013). D.E. 416 at 60. Specifically, petitioners contend the government has not demons

ac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 If • • TV 11. Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Bi

would 25 EFTA00799849 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 408 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2017 Page 26 of 32 unfairly prejudice the opposing party. Tampa Bay Water v. HDR Engineering. Inc. 731 F.3d 1171, 1182 (11th Cir. 2013) citing Robinson v. Tyson Foods. Inc., 595 F.3d 1269, 1273 (11th Cir. 2010).

3301 Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard

Scott & Kissane, Miami, FL. For The Palm Beach Post, Palm Beach Daily News, Intervenors: Rachel Elise Fugate, LEAD ATTORNEY, Thomas & LoCicero PL, Tampa, FL. JUDGES: KENNETH A. MARRA, United State District Judge. OPINION BY: KENNETH A. MARRA OPINION OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Cour

ed States Attorney's Office, West Palm Beach. FL; Dexter Lee, LEAD ATTORNEY, United States Attorney's Office, Miami, FL. For Roy Black, Intervenor: Jacqueline Perczek, Roy Eric Black, Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, Miami, FL; Jay P. Lefkowitz, PRO HAC VICE, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, New York, NY; Martin G. Weinbe

ld 25 EFTA00591486 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 401-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 27 of 33 unfairly prejudice the opposing party. Tampa Bay Water v. HDR Engineering. Inc. 731 F.3d 1171, 1182 (11th Cir. 2013) citing Robinson v. Tyson Foods. Inc., 595 F.3d 1269, 1273 (11th Cir. 2010).

at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Tel: E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami , FL 33131 Tel: Email: [email protected] Roy E. Black BLACK