Epstein Secrets

, ERNST LUDAnistenkind-Marcella (Dube L. 136.1 of II) 80,000 50.000 50.000 (30,003). (63.022.455) 100% NARROWS 'MARIN, JOHN From Crotch Isle. Maine 60.000 30.000 30000 (30000) (63.052.455). 100%. NARROWS HUGO. VICTOR A Figure Passing in the Horizon, a Gothic Chapel in 154.319 125.000

38 1.750.000 50.000 1,750,000 50,000 (10030). (9.538) (63.755.660) (63.765,197) 100%. 100%. NARROWS ENSOR. JAMES Le Combat des pouilleux Desir et Rissole - the Fighi 124.117 115.000 115.000 (9.117) (63.774,314). 100% NARROWS ENSOR, JAMES Les Bans COsteride • The Baths at Ostend (7.11

0 00500g (30.188) (30042) (30.000), (513.199.813). (56.229.855), (56259,655) 100% 100% 100%, NARROWS NARROWS MARIN, JOHN From Crotch Isle, Maine . HUGO. VICTOR A Figure Passing in the Horizon. a Gothic Chapel in 60.000 154,319 125.000 30. 125.000 (30.000), (29319) (56.289.855) (56.

56.993.060). 100% NARROWS EDOUARD Mannequin 58538 . 50.000 . 50,000 (9,538), (57,002,597) 100%. NARROWS .Le 'ENSOR. Combat des poutileux Desir et Rissole - the Fight ENSOR. JAMES 124,117 115.000 118000 (9.117) (57.011.714) 100%. NARROWS .Le ENSOR. JAMES Les Bans dOstende - The Bat

in 1904. Zinc etching on heavy wove paper KLEE. PAUL 5 x 5'/ inches (sheet: 16 1/2 x 12 '4 inches) 50.000 50,000 100% 6XTFP From Crotch Isle, Maine 1922 Watercolor on paper MARIN. JOHN 16'% x 19 1/2 inches 50.000 50.000 100% 3XJBL Nu a la baignoire Brown crayon on paper BONNARD. PIERR

100% 3XJFR 'Untitled 2013 Set of five glass lamps Dimensions variable PARDO. JORGE JP 13/004 117.585 100% 99N1P1 Le Combat des pouilleux Desir et Rissole - the Fight of the Down-andouts Desir et Rissole (Combat of the Rascals) (7.19) 1888 Etching and drypoint heightened with gouache and

invokes the privilege bears the burden of establishing that it ap- plies to the communications at issue and that it not been waived. See State of Maine . United States Dept of the Interi- or, 29 F.3d 60, 71 (1st Cir.2002); United States Bollin, 264 F.3d 391, 412 (4th ar.2 ). Thus, XYZ must carry

d waivers sweep. Like most courts, this court has yet to de- velop a jurisprudence clarifying the scope gf such implied waivers. See United States Desir, 273 F.3d 39, 45 (1st Cir.2001). [12][13] In approaching these un- answered questions, we start with the unar- guable proposition that the attorney-