Epstein Secrets

nded to make a mockery of the judicial system. Id. at *4. In adopting the two-part test, the Eleventh Circuit expressly considered New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742 (2001), a Supreme Court decision which utilized a three-part test for the application of judicial estoppel, including the plaintiff's

Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. el.I.LULLICyJ LU1 J CMG LUC tuna Janc A-ivy Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard,

nded to make a mockery of the judicial system. Id. at *4. In adopting the two-part test, the Eleventh Circuit expressly considered New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742 (2001), a Supreme Court decision which utilized a three-part test for the application of judicial estoppel, including the plaintiff's

ac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 If • • TV 11. Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Bi

inconsistent position introduces no risk of inconsistent court determinations and thus poses little threat to judicial integrity." New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 750-51 (2001). The victims never pressed their argument that Epstein was estopped from denying that he has abused the victims — much

system: Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafafia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf 201 S Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein /5/ twee, j2. £doonee4 65 EFTA00799952 Cas

on omitted). Judicial estoppel prohibits "parties from deliberately changing positions according to the exigencies of the moment." New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749-50 (2001). The Eleventh Circuit has identified three factors to be considered in determining whether to apply the equitable doct

3301 Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard

on omitted). Judicial estoppel prohibits "parties from deliberately changing positions according to the exigencies of the moment." New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749-50 (2001). The Eleventh Circuit has identified three factors to be considered in determining whether to apply the equitable doct

at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Tel: E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami , FL 33131 Tel: Email: [email protected] Roy E. Black BLACK

inconsistent position introduces no risk of inconsistent court determinations and thus poses little threat to judicial integrity." New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742,750-51 (2001). The victims never had "success" in arguing that Epstein was estopped from denying that he has abused the victims. Inde

r Drive, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 (404) 581-6000 Jill.Steinberg®uisdoj.gov [email protected] Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf 201 S Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 305-371-6421 Fax: 358-2006 Email: pleading®royblack.com A