Epstein Secrets

ither relevant nor will lead to discovery of relevant information." Id at 95. In All- state Insurance Co. v. Botcher, 733 Sold 993 EXHIBITV O 2009 Thomson ReuterstWest. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstreameaspx?s plitttprfl=HTMLEttifm=NotSet&mt... 4/10/2009 EFTA00614453 Page

efore the court; judge expan- ded parameters of permitted discovery to a fishing expedition which "might give rise to a potential cause of action." West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). '706 Sharon Lee Stedman, of Sharon Lee Stedman, PA., Orlando, and Jack E. Carstensen of Rigdon, Alexander & Rigdon,

etitioners argue that those portions de- part from the essential requirements of law and will cause them irreparable harm because they will be 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Oov. Works. Ar( 41 EXHIBIT Imp://web2.westlaw.com/printiprintstream.aspx'?sv=Spl it&prft=HTMLE8dfrn=NotSet&mt... 3/26/2009

scovery in civil cases must be relevant to subject matter of case and must be admissible or reason- ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(bX1). [2) Pretrial Procedure 307A te=031 307A Pretrial Procedure 307A11 Depositions and Discovery 307A11(A) Discovery in Ge

itioners argue that those portions de- part from the essential requirements of law and will cause them irreparable harm because they will be © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Oov. Works. Ar( 41 EXHIBIT littp://web2.westlaw.com/printlprintstream.aspx'?sv=Split&prft=HTMLE8dfin=NotSet&mt... 3/26/2009

scovery in civil cases must be relevant to subject matter of case and must be admissible or reason- ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule I .280(b)(1). [2) Pretrial Procedure 307A €=.31 307A Pretrial Procedure 307A11 Depositions and Discovery 307A11(A) Discovery in G

appellate court proceedings in the statutes pertaining to the responsibilities of guardians ad litem." FN7. The Former Husband contends that 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLE&ifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00180833 769

.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. C 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspeprft=1-ITML

rence to appellate court proceedings in the statutes pertaining to the responsibilities of guardians ad FN7. The Former Husband contends that 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft—HTMLEAtifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00231333 76

ppeal in deciding whether to grant stay include moving party's likelihood of success on merits, and likelihood of harm should stay not be granted. West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(f). [31 Child Custody 76D etzz9OS 76D Child Custody 76DX111 Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk905 k. Transfer of Cause and

11k19.3(3)) Minor children in custody proceeding are not con- sidered as "necessary parties" to action. (12] Child Custody 7613 e=•903__ it 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLEctifin=NotSet&destinationt... 6/25/2009 EFTA00232449 7

ppeal in deciding whether to grant stay include moving party's likelihood of success on merits, and likelihood of harm should stay not be granted. West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(0. (3) Child Custody 76D €:=7905 76D Child Custody 76DXfli Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk905 k. Transfer of Cause and P