Epstein Secrets

. McCAWLEY: Okay. 21 THE COURT: Does that work for you all? 22 MR. PAGLIUCA: I can't do the 10th, your Honor, I'm in 23 a deposition all day in Colorado. I'm sorry. 24 THE COURT: How could you possibly take another case? 25 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, believe me, I have a lot of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTE

d actual 2 prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that 3 were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were made 4 to Crescenz. 5 And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. 6 Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective 7 reasonableness by the of

he 10th. MS. McCAWLEY: Okay. THE COURT: Does that work for you all? MR. PAGLIUCA: I can't do the 10th, your Honor, I'm in a deposition all day in Colorado. I'm sorry. THE COURT: How could you possibly take another case? MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, believe me, I have a lot of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

d actual 2 prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that 3 were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were made 4 to Crescenz. 5 And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. 6 Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective 7 reasonableness by the of

0th. MS. McCAWLEY: Okay. THI Gl COURT: Does that work for you all? MR. PAGLIUCA: I can't do the 10th, your Honor, I'm in a deposition all day in Colorado. I'm sorry. THE COURT: How could you possibly take another case? MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, believe me, I have a lot of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

efendant had actual prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were mad to Crescenz. And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective reasonableness by the officers who