Epstein Secrets

ch County, Florida aboard the Boeini 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant caused one or m

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

hone call was between states) or purely intrastate in nature ( i.e. , the telephone call was made to another telephone within the same state)."). In Drury , the defendant used his land-line telephone to call an undercover agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Ge

speak to the FBI. Another woman who worked for Epstein in the early 1990's starting when she was 15 now lives in Australia. Her family (who live in Colorado) and the young woman both expressed fear about talking to the authorities about Epstein and refused to provide any information to the FBI. A woman

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury, the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the d

Circuit has ruled that evidence of the use of a telethone satisfies the element of using a facility or means of interstate commerce. United States.. Drury, 396 F.3d 1303, 1311 (11th Cir. 2005) (the term "facility of interstate commerce ... establishes federal jurisdiction whenever any "facility of int

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury, the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the d

board the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and 48 EFTA02857567 traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant be made to a t

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

Beach County, Florida aboard the Boein ' i 727 aircraft ownec endant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant caused one or m