Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00595612

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

rdale, Florida 33301 7 BY: BRADLEY EDWARDS, ESQ. 8 9 HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 10 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 11 BY: JEFFREY PAGLIUCA, ESQ. 12 13 PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Deponent 14 25 West Flagler Street Suite 800 15 Miami, Flor

ff may present in her case-in-chief. Ms. Maxwell has filed well-founded motions in limine to exclude the testimony of both Dr. Kliman and Professor Coonan prohibiting from providing their credibility and vouching opinions. This is the subject matter of Dr. Esplin's rebuttal report which explains that

ce on the same subject matter identified" in the expert report of another party, there would be no basis to for Dr. Esplin to testify if Kliman and Coonan are excluded. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)(ii). Moreover, because Dr. Esplin is a designated rebuttal expert, it is entirely improper to have any por

EFTA00792756

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ee also LeBlanc v. Cleveland, 248 F.3d 95, 100 (2d Cir. 2001). The complaint was filed on September 21, 2015 at which time Plaintiff was living in Colorado and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell was living in New York. Plaintiff is a United States Citizen. Plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of $75,000.00

ssary to authenticate business records under FRE 803(b) 27. Any witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal 28. Dr. Kliman (expert) 29. Dr. Coonan (expert) 30. Jim Jansen (expert) 31. Chris Andersen (expert) 32. Bill Chandler (rebuttal expert) 33. Dianne Flores (expert) Plaintiff reserv

EFTA00617396

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page