Epstein Secrets

800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghisla

District of New York with related, but distinct weapons possession offense). The Court should not apply them here. Instead, the Court should follow the Third Circuit's approach in United States v. Gebbie, 294 F.3d 540 (3nd Cir. 2002), which involved a situation like this one where the charges in the second prosecu

ch County, Florida aboard the Boeini 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant caused one or m

e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt , 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra : There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohi

speak to the FBI. Another woman who worked for Epstein in the early 1990's starting when she was 15 now lives in Australia. Her family (who live in Colorado) and the young woman both expressed fear about talking to the authorities about Epstein and refused to provide any information to the FBI. A woman

made is under twenty-one. United Stalest Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra: There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohib

prepared with pending litigation in mind, the primary motivation behind the creation of such reports was for use in the normal course of business); Colorado ex rel. Woodard Schmidt-Tiago Construction Co„ 108 F.R.D. 731, 734-35 (D. Cob. 1985) (absent additional evidence, no work product protection for re

pport Systems: Why Give Up More Than Necessary, 14 John Marshall J. of Comp. & Inf. Law 523, 551 (1996) (noting that "other courts have not accepted the Third Circuit's position" in Sporck). Even those courts which have found some basis for agreement with Sporck have rejected its broad expansion of the work product

e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (1 1 th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra: There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohib

board the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and 48 EFTA02857567 traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant be made to a t

e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt , 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra : There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohi

Beach County, Florida aboard the Boein ' i 727 aircraft ownec endant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant caused one or m