Epstein Secrets

Haddon. Morgan and Foreman, e c Laura A. Menninger II A I> DO N MORGAN FOREMAN April 6. 2016 Via Email ISO East 10th Avenue Denver. Colorado 80203 Re: Giuffre Maxwell, 15-cv-07433-RWS I appreciate your taking the time to talk to me yesterday. As you know, I represent Ghislaine Maxwell

n action brought by Plaintiff :aka Jane Doe #3). During the course of discovery disputes Ms. Sigrid McCawley, counsel for represented to the Hon. Robert W. Sweet that my client is "under investigation" by an unidentified law enforcement agency. She argues, therefore, that she can withhold documents based ini

t of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 1940 New York, New York 10007-1312 Haddon. Morgan and semen, Affray S. Pognuca 130 East KM Avernus Denver. Colorado 80203 303.831.7364 n 303 832.2 r-• - • crap 4s: Re: v, Maxwell. 15-ev-07433-RWS Dear Judge Sweet: I am writing to request the Court to extend

5/17 Page 1 of 2 HADDON MORGAN POillMAN 2 ECEOWE f----- I 29LL IJ JUDGE SWEET CHAMBERS December 29, 2016 Via Facsimile O1211105-7925 Hon. Robert W. Sweet United States District Judge United States District Court Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Roo

Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012) 37 Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986) 97, 98, 99 Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (1987) 97 County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998) Cru

moved for an entry of a protective order for materials produced in discovery and submitted a proposed order for the consideration of the Honorable Robert W. Sweet, the United States District Judge who was then overseeing the Giu&•e v. Maxwell civil litigation. (See 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP), Dkt. Nos. 38 & 39-1). On