Epstein Secrets

a citizen of the State of Colorado. 7. Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is not a citizen of the state of Colorado. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 8. became a victim of sex trafficking and repeated sexual abuse after being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epste

727 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 3 of 12 PARTIES 6. Plaintiff is an individual who is a citizen of the State of Colorado. 7. Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is not a citizen of the state of Colorado. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 8.

a citizen of the State of Colorado. 7. Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is not a citizen of the state of Colorado. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 8. became a victim of sex trafficking and repeated sexual abuse after being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epste

his Court. 2 EFTA00676991 Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 3 of 12 PARTIES. 6. Plaintiff is an individual who is a citizen of the State of Colorado. 7. Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is not a citizen of the state of Colorado. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 8.

S ON DEFAULT, If en Event of Default occurs under We Agreement, at any time thereafter. Lender Pall have all the rights of a secured party under the Colorado Uniform Commercial Coca In addition and without limitation, Lender may exercise any one or more of the following rights and remedies: Accelerate In

nt. Governing Lew. This Agreement will be governed by federal law applicable to Lender and, to the extent not preempted by federal law, the laws of the State of Colorado without regard to Its conflicts of law provisions. This Agreement has been accepted by Lender In the State of Colorado. Choice of Venue. If there i

, which forced Dershowitz to seek the issuance of the subpoena through the commission process and ultimately to effect service on Jane Doe No. 3 in Colorado. After all that. Jane Doe No. 3's lawyers asked Dershowitz to consent to having this Court resolve the discovery dispute and for her deposition to b

is true—and that they were in fact true. Pursuant to the stipulated order entered by this Court on March 20, 2015 that appointed a Commissioner in the State of Colorado, Dershowitz served a subpoena for the production of documents and a videotaped deposition on Jane Doe No. 3. See Exhibit G.2. The subpoena seeks, a

3, which forced Dershowitz to seek the issuance of the subpoena through the commission process and ultimately to effect service on Jane Doe No. 3 in Colorado. After all that, Jane Doe No. 3's lawyers asked Dershowitz to consent to having this Court resolve the discovery dispute and for her deposition to

founded pleading." Exhibit A, Compl. 17. Pursuant to the stipulated order entered by this Court on March 20, 2015 that appointed a Commissioner in the State of Colorado, Dershowitz served a subpoena for the production of documents and a videotaped deposition on Jane Doe No. 3. See Exhibit G.2 The subpoena seeks, am