Epstein Secrets

ate different from any defendant." 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). Plaintiff here, a citizen of New Jersey, alleges against Defendants, citizens of Ohio or Colorado, an amount in controversy exceeding $5 million. (Compl. ¶¶ 20-23) Having confirmed jurisdiction, the Court now turns to the merits of Statebridge's

224, 1238 (10th Cir. 2004), so much so that Ihrighly fact-based, complex, difficult matters" arise as a matter of routine, Amchem, 521 U.S. at 630 (Breyer, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Unsurprisingly, then, we give district courts "broad discretion in deciding whether to allow the ma

ial by the United States District Court for the District of Utah, David K. Winder, J., and the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Zita L. Weinshienk, J., of mo- tions for bail pending appeal. After panel denied motions for release pending appeal, rehearing en banc was granted

if he had a legal mechanism by which to do so, and outweighed by public interest in protection from demonstrably dangerous defendants. Reversed. Breyer, Circuit Judge, dissented and filed an opinion. West Headnotes Page 1 Bail 49 C=39 49 Bail 49II In Criminal Prosecutions 49k39 k. Nature and S

al- ing on unequal terms based on the parish- ioner's trust, justifiably reposed, and whether that trust has been breached. See Moses v. Diocese of Colorado, 863 P2d 310, 321 n. 13 (Colo.1993) ("the relevant facts are that the defendants ... occupied a position of superiority, assumed a duty to act in

nst Sexual Exploitation Act and the White Slave Traffic Act. The offender moved to dismiss all actions against him. Holdings: The District Court, Breyer, J., held that: (1) in a matter of first impression, the doctrine of forum non conveniens applied, and (2) the action would be dismissed without p