Epstein Secrets

21 (Dkt. No. 189). Regards, Nicole EFTA00103377 www.hmflaw.com Nicole Simmons Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EFTA00103378

attention to page 5 of the joint letter, in which Menninger wrote: Indeed, this Court rejected Ms. Maxwell's argument that certain portions of the Response and its exhibits should be unredacted because the material had already been made public. See Dkt. No. 168 at 2-3; Letter Motion of Laura A. Menning

JEFFREY C. PEPIN MICHAEL J. PIKE HEATHER. MCNAMARA RUDA DAVID YAREMA I FIORJOA BOARD GUMMED CM!. TRW. LAWYER IAOMITIIID TO PRACTICE IN IRMO* AND COLORADO BURtvtAN, CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN.LLY YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP December 9, 2009 BY HAND DELIVERY Judge Donald Ha

of the breach and then move forward with Epstein's prosecution. Accordingly, the undersigned would agree with Epstein's statement at page 4 of its Response, that the fact there exists a Non-Prosecution Agreement does not mean that Epstein is free from future criminal prosecution, and that in fact, "the

harlequin.) I request that Honey gently ask them to stop with the press releases. Here’s what she sent: Dear All, Jacobs often receives mails from Colorado news, too often. They are definitely interesting topics. However, these topics are not suitable for “Esquire.” Further, we do understand that you ha

for the trees in a sea of extraneous details. From an actionable information standpoint, I consume a maximum of one-third of one industry magazine (Response magazine) and one business magazine (/nc.) per month, for a grand total of approximately four hours. That’s it for results-oriented reading. I read a