Epstein Secrets

:5 194:14,16 191:25 galley follow-up 114:13,24 194:22,25 194:24 28:19 29:20 199:4 116:6 195:17 195:4 29:21 94:2 forbid 117:22 197:18 Francisco 94:4 38:20 118:8,12 198:5,18,23 191:23 galley's forced 119:6 121:3 199:10,24 free 28:20 198:2,10 121:16,23 200:8 150:20 general foreb

16 apply to him or how did that work? 17 A. Oh, no, no, no. It's -- No. He wouldn't 18 be involved in that type of activity. You apply to 19 H.R. and you interview with the Director of 20 Operations or the Chief Pilot. You know, he 21 wouldn't. 22 O. So you start with Wexner in 1988. 23

oanalytic Institute. February 9th 1996 22 EFTA00182877 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 144-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 23 of 23 Francisco and Seattle, private therapeutic preschool in San Francisco, and Cornerstone Argentina 24. Thirty four year follow-up of a Cornerstone Treated aut

s MI , aikia ' " and to perform, among other things, services as personal assistants. EFTA00182890 2. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and paid.., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 3. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm B

. income rule, these regulations apply the same principles for determining whether income is possession ECI as have applied since the 1986 Act. See Francisco v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 317 (2002)M, 370 F.3d 1228 (M. Cir. 2004) (principles of section 864(c)(4) apply for determining whether U.S. source inco

themselves of 19 EFTA00577278 the tax benefits that Congress intended to provide only to individuals who actually reside in the possessions. See H.R. Rep. No. 108-755, at 780 (2004). Consistent with this legislative history, these regulations include several exceptions to the general statutory ru