Epstein Secrets

ate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Jane Doe No. 4. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 03/27/2009) 04/0' 009 :74 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 4/20/2009 (Attachments:

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy'. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe No. 3. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit BXMermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17522982239968766-L_801_0-1 6/9/2009 EFTA00175723 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd • Pag

, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41h DCA 1983); Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

Motion, to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents by Jane Doe No. 5. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/03/2009) 04/13/2009 73 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response /Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or Co

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi 1 Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy i Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

Page 5 of 14 r 435.3 KB and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe No. 7. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 03/27/2009) 03/27/2009 24 MOTION to Consolidate Cases for purposes of discovery ( Responses due by 4/13/2009), MOTION to Quash by Jan

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

e to Motion, to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/03/2009) 04/06/2009 71 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 66 MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-Incrimination. See DeLisi I Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41b DCA 1983)• Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo