Epstein Secrets

would render the statute a prior restraint, “the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights.” Nebraska Press Ass’ny. Stuart, 427 U.S.1539, -559 (1976) (noting a “deeply-seated American hostility to prior restraints”). To the extent redactions to the grand jury materials ma

from the nature of their institution,’ powers ‘which cannot be dispensed with in a Court, because they are necessary to the. exercise of all others.” Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43 (1991). “There can be no question ofthe inherent power of a court ‘to protect itself, and hence society, as an instru

Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 03/26/2009) 67 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 4/20/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhib

y not be filed electronically, they must be filed in the conventional paper format in the division where the Judge is chambered. The Clerk contacted Chambers and corrected the docket text to indicate the document is an emergency matter. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must

e to Motion, to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/03/2009) 04/06/2009 71 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 66 MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash

t prejudice to Defendant reasserting the grounds asserted in the motion if he deems it appropriate as to the Amended Complaint. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 23n° day of September, 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All c

t, Plaintiff's Jane Does 2-8' Memorandum Response to Defendant's Rule 4 Appeal by Jane Doe. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 05/28/2010) 06/14/2010 77 Emergency MOTION for Protective Order by Jane Doe II. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(ots) (Enter

not be filed electronically, they must be filed in the conventional paper format in the division where the judge is chambered. The Clerk contacted Chambers and corrected the docket text to indicate the document is an emergency matter. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must c

for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe No. 7. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 03/27/2009) MOTION to Consolidate Cases for purposes of discovery ( Responses due by 4/13/2009), MOTION to Quash by Jane Doe No. 7. See

not be filed electronically, they must be filed in the conventional paper format in the division where the judge is chambered. The Clerk contacted Chambers and corrected the docket text to indicate the document is an emergency matter. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must c