3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
5 / 3
Mentions
wing information 15 was obtained from the trash from 358 El Brillo. 16 BY MR. KUVIN: 17 Q. What additional messages w 18 A. One from Jean Luc, David, There 19 was some redacted redacted, Brit Ri n 20 is redacted, redacted, 21 a message fora receipt dated 4/4 at 1:05, 22 ith a phone numbe
l and good but 24 the fact is is that she does not have a notice 25 of appearance here in this. 1 MR. PIKE: Form. 2 THE WITNESS: Yes. Captain David Rodgers, 3 Co-captain Larry Visosld, flight engineer, 4 Larry Morrison. 5 BY MR. KUVIN: 6 Q. Okay. In this trash pull were there also 7 messages le
. PIKE: Form. 2 THE WITNESS: Yes. Captain David Rodgers, 3 Co-captain Larry Visosld, flight engineer,
Page UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. VOLUME I OF II Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80
in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated — ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v.
65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Para
in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated — ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v.
65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Para
Entities connected to both David Rodgers and JANE DOE NO

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Lesley Groff
PERSON
FedEx
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Richard Kahn
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON