7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the
position that this case is civil litigation, the victims have been making (and are Rule 1 note that there are certain limitations to application of the Civil Rules, found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 81. None of the limitations in Rule 81 (e.g., for bankruptcy and citizenship proceedings) apply in this case. 9 EFTA002
are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the
position that this case is civil litigation, the victims have been making (and are Rule 1 note that there are certain limitations to application of the Civil Rules, found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 81. None of the limitations in Rule 81 (e.g., for bankruptcy and citizenship proceedings) apply in this case. 9 EFTA002
are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the
position that this case is civil litigation, the victims have been making (and are Rule 1 note that there are certain limitations to application of the Civil Rules, found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 81. None of the limitations in Rule 81 (e.g., for bankruptcy and citizenship proceedings) apply in this case. 9 EFTA002
are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the
position that this case is civil litigation, the victims have been making (and are Rule 1 note that there are certain limitations to application of the Civil Rules, found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 81. None of the limitations in Rule 81 (e.g., for bankruptcy and citizenship proceedings) apply in this case. 9 EFTA002
are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the
osition that this case is civil litigation, the victims have been making (and arc I Rule I note that there are certain limitations to application of the Civil Rules, found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 81. None of the limitations in Rule 81 (e.g., for bankruptcy and citizenship proceedings) apply in this case. 9 EFTA001
are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the
position that this case is civil litigation, the victims have been making (and are Rule 1 note that there are certain limitations to application of the Civil Rules, found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 81. None of the limitations in Rule 81 (e.g., for bankruptcy and citizenship proceedings) apply in this case. 9 EFTA002
are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the
position that this case is civil litigation, the victims have been making (and are Rule 1 note that there are certain limitations to application of the Civil Rules, found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 81. None of the limitations in Rule 81 (e.g., for bankruptcy and citizenship proceedings) apply in this case. 9 08-8073
Entities connected to both Courtney Wild and the Civil Rules

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Woody Allen
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Barry Diller
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Michael Douglas
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
West Palm Beach
LOCATION
Thomas Jefferson
PERSON