Epstein Secrets

ce leads to more interesting, more exotic, more wild, and more heroic adventures than the machine-sup

l over their private information. In neither case, Lanier said, would Weiner have sent his illicit snapshots. "What makes it erotic is the risk," Lanier speculated. "If you had either perfect competence or no need for competence, because everything was a hundred per cent transparent, there would b

ssed on the long game, not the item of the week Because the issues I'm talking about will take a long time to address." F or the past eight years, Lanier has lived in Berkeley, the mecca of techno-utopianism, in a ridgetop house that he shares with his wife, Lena, who is a child psychologist, and t

cebook's controversial de- ployment of facial-recognition software, which automatically scans uploaded pho- tos and identifies a user's friends. To Lanier, a computer scientist and author, the common thread is that the In- ternet in general—and social networking in particular—has become difficult for

e invostmonta and atrareed ~Ouds. Private/ ~woel Wild« (rob:kg doen Witterm Program indaal Wad tenumre

19 3-month Treasury bills 2 36% One-month LIBOR 2 51% Page 2 of 6 SDNY_GM_00324412 EFTA_00 97187 EFTA01306685 UBS Business Services Account Lanier), 2019 Account name: IIRRAMAR PROJECT, INC Friendly account name-TERRA:AAR Account number- Change in the value of your account Cash activity sum

th the panel's Democrat, Pennsylvania Rep. Susan Wild, who said she expected to move "rather quickly" o

ing father of virtual reality, said that Mr. Epstein's ideas did not amount to science, in that they did not lend themselves to rigorous proof. Mr. Lanier said Mr. Epstein had once hypothesized that atoms behaved like investors in a marketplace. Mr. Lanier said he had declined any funding from Mr. Epst

th the panel's Democrat, Pennsylvania Rep. Susan Wild, who said she expected to move "rather quickly" o

ing father of virtual reality, said that Mr. Epstein's ideas did not amount to science, in that they did not lend themselves to rigorous proof. Mr. Lanier said Mr. Epstein had once hypothesized that atoms behaved like investors in a marketplace. Mr. Lanier said he had declined any funding from Mr. Epst

th the panel's Democrat, Pennsylvania Rep. Susan Wild, who said she expected to move "rather quickly" o

ing father of virtual reality, said that Mr. Epstein's ideas did not amount to science, in that they did not lend themselves to rigorous proof. Mr. Lanier said Mr. Epstein had once hypothesized that atoms behaved like investors in a marketplace. Mr. Lanier said he had declined any funding from Mr. Epst

197701 wbergerrikra-law.com H Isurdocs‘09-22784 Wild v. EpsteitikEPSTEIN M.FEES.doc 09112/2019 PEE C

vit of Jeffrey Epstein and Igor Zinoviev, Exhibit 4 and 5, respectively. 12. The entire incident was completely unknown to the undersigned and Mr. Lanier until Adam Horowitz, Esq. came in and announced that the deposition was not going to take place in that Mr. Epstein and his client saw one another,