Epstein Secrets

(d)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's 'right to be tre

interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside.. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial appearance—whi

(d)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's 'right to be tre

interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside.. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial appearance—whi

(d)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's 'right to be tre

interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside.. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial appearance—whi

16 (1975) (holding that the Fourth Amendment requires a judicial determination of probable cause prior to extended detention); County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 52-58 (1991) (defining "prompt" under Gerstein's requirement of a prompt judicial determination of probable cause). 6 Brady v. Marylan

as well as juries) are unduly skeptical of rape allegations. '7? And there is good evidence that law enforcement agencies’ responses to 19 See In re Petersen, No. 2:10-CV-298 RM, 2010 WL 5108692, at 2 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010) (concluding that prosecutors control charging decisions and certain victim rights