Epstein Secrets

D AND DELIVERED THAT DETERMINATION WAS ENTIRELY FAIR AND PROPER 33 CONCLUSION 63 EFTA00602339 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Contrast People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d 571 (2d Dept. 2008) 57 58 43 36 35 People v. Belter, 84 A.D.3d 905 (2d Dept. 2011) People v. Brensic, 70 N.Y.2d 9 (1987) People v.

45 A.D.3d 429 (1st Dept. 2007) 36 People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563 (2009) 36-37, 40 People v. O'Neal, 35 A.D.3d 302 (1st Dept. 2006) 36 People v. Pettigrew, 14 N.Y.3d 406 (2010) 36 People v. Roland, 292 A.D.2d 271 (1st Dept. 2002) 38 People v. Smith, 75 A.D.3d 1112 (4th Dept. 2010) 58 People v. Vas

D AND DELIVERED THAT DETERMINATION WAS ENTIRELY FAIR AND PROPER 33 CONCLUSION 63 EFTA00792501 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Contrast People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d 571 (2d Dept. 2008) 57 58 43 36 35 People v. Belter, 84 A.D.3d 905 (2d Dept. 2011) People v. Brensic, 70 N.Y.2d 9 (1987) People v.

45 A.D.3d 429 (1st Dept. 2007) 36 People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563 (2009) 36-37, 40 People v. O'Neal, 35 A.D.3d 302 (1st Dept. 2006) 36 People v. Pettigrew, 14 N.Y.3d 406 (2010) 36 People v. Roland, 292 A.D.2d 271 (1st Dept. 2002) 38 People v. Smith, 75 A.D.3d 1112 (4th Dept. 2010) 58 People v. Vas

D AND DELIVERED THAT DETERMINATION WAS ENTIRELY FAIR AND PROPER 33 CONCLUSION 63 EFTA00181148 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Contrast People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d 571 (2d Dept. 2008) 57 People v. lielter, 84 A.D.3d 905 (2d Dept. 2011) 58 People v. Brensir, 70 N.Y.2d 9 (1987) 43 People v. Conway

hat the risk factors giving rise to the offender's score were supported by "dear and convincing evidence." ,egg Correction Law §168- n(3); People v. Pettigrew, 14 N.Y.3d 406, 408 (2010); People v. O'Neal. 35 A.D.3d 302 (1st Dept 2006). That SORA employs this relatively-relaxed standard, as opposed to proo