Epstein Secrets

D AND DELIVERED THAT DETERMINATION WAS ENTIRELY FAIR AND PROPER 33 CONCLUSION 63 EFTA00602339 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Contrast People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d 571 (2d Dept. 2008) 57 58 43 36 35 People v. Belter, 84 A.D.3d 905 (2d Dept. 2011) People v. Brensic, 70 N.Y.2d 9 (1987) People v.

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

D AND DELIVERED THAT DETERMINATION WAS ENTIRELY FAIR AND PROPER 33 CONCLUSION 63 EFTA00792501 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Contrast People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d 571 (2d Dept. 2008) 57 58 43 36 35 People v. Belter, 84 A.D.3d 905 (2d Dept. 2011) People v. Brensic, 70 N.Y.2d 9 (1987) People v.

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

D AND DELIVERED THAT DETERMINATION WAS ENTIRELY FAIR AND PROPER 33 CONCLUSION 63 EFTA00181148 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Contrast People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d 571 (2d Dept. 2008) 57 People v. lielter, 84 A.D.3d 905 (2d Dept. 2011) 58 People v. Brensir, 70 N.Y.2d 9 (1987) 43 People v. Conway

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); people v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratui