Epstein Secrets

Q. Who did you see at house? 13 A. Many. It was senators. It was Senator 14 Mitchell. George Mitchell. It was Prince Andrew. It 15 was Princess Sarah. 16 Q. Princess? 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 19 A. Ferguson. 20 And it was a couple Misses. Misses Yugoslavia,

s Senator 14 Mitchell. George Mitchell. It was Prince Andrew. It 15 was Princess Sarah. 16 Q. Princess? 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 19 A. Ferguson. 20 And it was a couple Misses. Misses Yugoslavia, 21 Miss Germany that I don't even know the names. But they 22 were a lot o

17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 19 A. Ferguson. 20 And it was a couple Misse

6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 EXHIBITS 1 Message pad 2 Documents INDEX OF EXAMINATION WITNESS DIRECT CROSS ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ (By Mr. Mermelstein) 12 (By Mr. Edwards) 157 (By Mr. Langino) 260 INDEX OF EXHIBITS PAGE 72 115 Page 6 Page 8 1 Doe right here on the copy you gave me. I'm

Richard Willits, representing MR. BERGER: William J. Berger, representing M., M. and Jane Doc number two. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Stuart Mennetstein of Mermelstein and Horowitz. representing Jane Does numbers two through eight. MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino, on behalf of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Many. It was senators. It was Senator 13 met him. 14 Mitchell. George Mitchell. It was Prince Andrew. It 14 Q. Were Prince Andrew and Princess Sarah friends 15 was Princess Sarah. 15 of Ms. Maxwell? 16 Q. Princess? 16 A. Both of them. 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 17 Q. Both Ms. Max

Sarah. 15 of Ms. Maxwell? 16 Q. Princess? 16 A. Both of them. 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 17 Q. Both Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein? 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 18 A. Yeah. 19 A. Ferguson. 19 Q. Did -- did they ever have massages when they 20 And it was a couple Misses. Misses Yugoslavia. 20 were t

. Both Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein? 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 18 A. Yeah. 19 A. Ferguson. 19 Q. Did -- d

21 Q. All right. And how did you happen to get that 22 MR. MERMELSTEIN: Stuart Mermelstein of 22 job? Was it through an employment agency -- 23 Mermelstein and Horowitz. representing Jane Does 23 A. No. 24 numbers two through eight. 24 Q. -- or an ad in the paper? 25 MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino. on

ent." The victim notification letters were not sent to prospective clients, nor were they for the purpose of obtaining professional employment. Ms. Ferguson next referred to Rule 4-4.2 "Communication with Person Represented by Counsel." As explained above, with one exception, letters to victims represen

pond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is

orrespondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal ad

pond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is d

orrespondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal ad

. Mermelstein and thank you for extending my response deadling to November 30, 2008. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is

, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal advice regarding my obligations pursuant to statute or court order. Nonetheless, Ms. Ferguson did refer me to the relevant Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, specifically Rules 4-7.4(a), 4-4.2(a), and 4- 3.4(c). EFTA00216178 Rule 4-7.4 Mr.

. Mermelstein and thank you for extending my response deadline to November 30, 2008. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is

orrespondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal ad

. Mermelstein and thank you for extending my response deadline to November 30, 2008. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is

espondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. F'- In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal ad

. Mermelstein and thank you for extending my response deadline to November 30, 2008. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is

correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal a

pond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is

orrespondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal ad

pond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is d