Epstein Secrets

ntaining information derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards. MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which

urt matter. MR. SCAROLA: We are. MR. LINK: I may have misunderstood, because this is a bankruptcy declaration. And there isn't anything in Judge Hafele's order that talks about bankruptcy testimony or spoke that you can inquire about. Obviously, by signing this he has adopted every statement in t

m from a disc that we started reviewing on February 25th, 2018? I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

19/18 Page 69 of 97 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Whic

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

ourt matter. MR. SCAROLA: We are. MR. LINK: I may have misunderstood, because this is a bankruptcy declaration. And there isn't anything in Judge Hafele's order that talks about bankruptcy testimony or spoke that you can inquire about. Obviously, by signing this, he has adopted every statement in

2/18 Page 73 of 165 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Whic

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

else did he tell you? MR. LINK: So, I'm going to instruct you not to answer based both on attorney- client privilege and exceeds the scope of Judge Hafele's order. I" Epstein Depo. Tr. at 22. Clearly Epstein put forward the conversation with his attorney about the disc in paragraph four of his declara

y of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., and Brad Edwards, and other current or former clients of Farmer, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law." [DE 888]. 7. On S

er. Ultimately, following a summary judgment motion by Edwards, Epstein dropped his lawsuit; currently pending before Judge Crow's successor, Judge Hafele, is a follow-on action, Edwards v. Epstein, for malicious prosecution by Epstein in filing his lawsuit in the first place. 6 EFTA00799319 Case 0