Epstein Secrets

EPSTEIN and MI Defendent(s). SUBPOENA DUCES TECUNI WITHOUT DEPOSITION THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: Yellow Cob Tel: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., on March 2, 2009, and to have with you at that time and place the following: Duces Tecum: Any and all trip receipts, logs, information dat

urdensome and over- broad, but also constituted a fishing expedition un- related to the issues raised by the pleadings. In Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91, 95 (Fla.1995), the supreme court held that certi- orari was available and should be used to quash an order "to the extent that it pe

tiff(s), VS. E. EPSTEIN and MI Defendant(s). SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., n March 2, 2009, and to have with you at that time and place the following: Duces Tecum: Any and all trip receipts, logs, information d l

urdensome and over- broad, but also constituted a fishing expedition un- related to the issues raised by the pleadings. In Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91, 95 (Fla.1995), the supreme court held that certi- orari was available and should be used to quash an order "to the extent that it pe

da Courts eFiling Portal and thus served by electronic mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] to: Jack Scarola, Esq, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., Counsel for Plaintiff, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, Florida 33409; [email protected] to: Joni J. Jones, Esq., Assistant Ut

to protect a non-party from discovery that would result in “annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense...” Al/state Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 2003) (Florida Supreme Court overturning denial of protective order and holding that “[d]iscovery of certain kinds of inform