Epstein Secrets

Icrocklaw.com Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 12 EFTA00805169 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 [email protected] Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Com

r cases as possible solely to impermissibly "inflame[] the jury or appeal [] improperly to the jury's emotions," or "solely to prove bad character." Wright v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). "[I]f the introduction of the evidence tends in act

EPSTEIN and MI Defendent(s). SUBPOENA DUCES TECUNI WITHOUT DEPOSITION THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: Yellow Cob Tel: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., on March 2, 2009, and to have with you at that time and place the following: Duces Tecum: Any and all trip receipts, logs, information dat

F.Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) 3. Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So.2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) 4. Lay v. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) 5. Wright v. Yurko, 446 So.2d 1162, 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).; 6. American Diversified Ins. Srvcs., Inc. v. Union Fidelity Life Ins., 439 So.2d 904 (Fla. 3d

condary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Bu

has probable cause to bring a suit when he has "a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances known to him, in the validity of the claim." Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (citing Goldstein v. Sabena, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956)). A litigant may rely on first-hand knowl

Second (FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00793363 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J.

ation from other cases as possible solely to impermissibly inflame the jury and appeal to the jury's emotions, or solely to prove bad character. See Wright v. State, 3 EFTA00793361 19 So. 3d 277 (Ha. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 3d 600 (Ha. 4th DCA 2009). "If the introduction of the evidenc

tiff(s), VS. E. EPSTEIN and MI Defendant(s). SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., n March 2, 2009, and to have with you at that time and place the following: Duces Tecum: Any and all trip receipts, logs, information d l

F.Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) 3. Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So.2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) 4. Lay v. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) 5. Wright v. Yurko, 446 So.2d 1162, 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).; 6. American Diversified Ins. Srvcs., Inc. v. Union Fidelity Life Ins., 439 So.2d 904 (Fla. 3d