Epstein Secrets

8 - FBI). Yet at her September, 2009 deposition now represented by EDWARDS and RRA, L.M. told a very different story: Q: My question was what did Carolyn tell you to tell Mr. Epstein about your age? A: She said it didn't matter. Q: That's your recollection about what she said? A: Yes, she said — I

se cases involving Epstein); b. Reached agreements to share attorneys fees with non-lawyers; c. Used investor money to pay plaintiffs (i.e., L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) "up front" money such that plaintiffs would refuse to settle the Civil Actions; d. Conducted searches, wiretaps or intercepted conver

ed she worked at eleven (11) separate strip clubs, including Cheetah which RRA represented and in which ROTHSTEIN may have owned an interest; and E.W. also worked at Platinum Showgirls in Boynton Beach, which was the subject of a recent police raid where dancers were allegedly selling prescriptio

8 - FBI). Yet at her September, 2009 deposition now represented by EDWARDS and RRA, L.M. told a very different story: Q: My question was what did Carolyn tell you to tell Mr. Epstein about your age? A: She said it didn't matter. Q: That's your recollection about what she said? A: Yes, she said — I

se cases involving Epstein); b. Reached agreements to share attorneys fees with non-lawyers; c. Used investor money to pay plaintiffs (i.e., L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) "up front" money such that plaintiffs would refuse to settle the Civil Actions; d. Conducted searches, wiretaps or intercepted conver

ed she worked at eleven (11) separate strip clubs, including Cheetah which RRA represented and in which ROTHSTEIN may have owned an interest; and E.W. also worked at Platinum Showgirls in Boynton Beach, which was the subject of a recent police raid where dancers were allegedly selling prescriptio

t reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05440-05441 04/01/2009 Bradley Edwards Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co- Counsel) CW Personal information Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 07025-07027 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell ■. and E.W. v. Epstein — Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide