Epstein Secrets

ates Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Reply in Support of Letter Motion to Stay Proceedings 20-cv-484 (JGK-DCF), Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et at Dear Judge Freeman: On behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, I write in further support of a Motion to Stay Proceedings in this matter unt

dings 20-cv-484 (JGK-DCF), Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et at Dear Judge Freeman: On behalf of defenda

tay Proceedings 20-cv-484 (JGK-DCF), Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et at Dear Judge Freeman: On behalf of

tay Proceedings 20-cv-484 (JGK-DCF), Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et at Dear Judge Freeman: On behalf of

case simply because she has been indicted." Resp. at 6. The Second Circuit has a litany of factors, articulated in Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83, 96 (2d Cir. 2012), and applied numerous times since. Plaintiff has not identified any case applying the Louis Vuitton factors in which

NER The Honorable Debra C. Freeman Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: May 18, 2020 v. Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, & Ghislaine Maxwell, 19-10475-LGS-DCF Dear Judge Freeman: Pursuant to Individual Rule I.D, Plaintiff hereby responds to Defenda

k, NY 10007-1312 Re: May 18, 2020 v. Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, & Ghislaine Maxwell, 19-10475-

. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: May 18, 2020 v. Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, & Ghislaine Maxwell, 1

. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: May 18, 2020 v. Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, & Ghislaine Maxwell, 19

ivil case to permit conclusion of a related criminal prosecution has been characterized as an extraordinary remedy." Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83, 98 (2d Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted). In this Circuit, courts balance the following six factors when considering whet

August 27, 2020 VIA ECF Hon. Debra C. Freeman Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Doe v. Indyke, et al., 1:20-cv-000484-JGK-DCF Plaintiff's Opposition Letter to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's Letter Motion to Stay Proceedings Dear Judge Freema

vil case to permit conclusion of a related criminal prosecution has been characterized as an "extraordinary remedy." Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83, 98 (2d Cir. 2012) (emphasis added). As a result, a civil defendant urging a stay pending a parallel criminal prosecution bears the bu