Epstein Secrets

s by the accusers, did not respond to requests for comment on the emails or the proposed resolution program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to a request for comment. Mr. Indyke was Mr. Epstein's longtime lawyer in New York, and Mr. Kahn was an acco

posed resolution program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to a request for comment. Mr. Indyke was Mr. Epstein's longtime lawyer in New York, and Mr. Kahn was an accountant for some of his companies. In the weeks since Mr. Epstein's death, la

program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to

From: Nicholas (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 11:05 AM To: (USANYS) < >; (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor) .c .) Subject: NYU Boies Schiller Sues Jeffrey Epstein Estate on Behalf of 3 Sexual Abuse Accusers The lawsuits, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

ng did not contain any explicit allegations of wrongdoing by Dershowitz, it did signal the latest salvo in an ongoing feud between the professor and Boies Schiller, which has represented Epstein accusers in a range of civil litigation. Until recently, Boies and McCawley represented who claimed that Dershowit

s by the accusers, did not respond to requests for comment on the emails or the proposed resolution program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to a request for comment. Mr. Indyke was Mr. Epstein's longtime lawyer in New York, and Mr. Kahn was an acco

posed resolution program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to a request for comment. Mr. Indyke was Mr. Epstein's longtime lawyer in New York, and Mr. Kahn was an accountant for some of his companies. In the weeks since Mr. Epstein's death, la

program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to

ed in the abuse, under the guise of a massage. Both of the are represented in the litigation by David Boies, Joshua Schiller and Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller. claimed in her filing that "Maxwell was regularly bringing school-aged girls to the mansion" in New York, and that they were always escorted upsta

nesses. F rom USANYS) Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 11:05 AM To: (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: NYU EFTA00040556 Boies Schiller Sues Jeffrey Epstein Estate on Behalf of 3 Sexual Abuse Accusers The lawsuits, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

s by the accusers, did not respond to requests for comment on the emails or the proposed resolution program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to a request for comment. Mr. Indyke was Mr. Epstein's longtime lawyer in New York, and Mr. Kahn was an acco

posed resolution program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to a request for comment. Mr. Indyke was Mr. Epstein's longtime lawyer in New York, and Mr. Kahn was an accountant for some of his companies. In the weeks since Mr. Epstein's death, la

program. The executors of Mr. Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, also did not respond to

ng did not contain any explicit allegations of wrongdoing by Dershowitz, it did signal the latest salvo in an ongoing feud between the professor and Boies Schiller, which has represented Epstein accusers in a range of civil litigation. Until recently, Boies and McCawley represented who claimed that Dershowit

otential witnesses. From (LISANYS) Sent: urs ay,November 14, 2019 11:05 AM To: USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: NYU > Boies Schiller Sues Jeffrey Epstein Estate on Behalf of 3 Sexual Abuse Accusers The lawsuits, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

with the same certification that she initially set out to achieve and returned to Ohio shortly after the alleged assault. All three lawsuits named Darren Indyke, a longtime attorney for Epstein, and Richard Kahn, who were named executors of Epstein's estate following his apparent suicide in August. Indyke a

alleged assault. All three lawsuits named Darren Indyke, a longtime attorney for Epstein, and Richard Ka

r the alleged assault. All three lawsuits named Darren Indyke, a longtime attorney for Epstein, and Rich

lase, Nicholas (USANYS)" To: "s., (USANYS)" < >, " (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS) [Contractor]" Subject: NYLJ Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:04:46 +0000 Boies Schiller Sues Jeffrey Epstein Estate on Behalf of 3 Sexual Abuse Accusers The lawsuits, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

ng did not contain any explicit allegations of wrongdoing by Dershowitz, it did signal the latest salvo in an ongoing feud between the professor and Boies Schiller, which has represented Epstein accusers in a range of civil litigation. Until recently, Boies and McCawley represented Virginia Giuffre, who claime

LP Attorneys for Defendants Jeffery Epstein, and BY: MICHAEL MILLER JUSTIN CHU DARREN K. INDYKE LLC Attorney for Defendant Jeffery Epstein BY: DARREN K. INDYKE SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00285631 I877DOEC APPEARANCES (Continued) HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Attorneys

ry Epstein, and BY: MICHAEL MILLER JUSTIN CHU DARREN K. INDYKE LLC Attorney for Defendant Jeffery Epstein BY:

, and BY: MICHAEL MILLER JUSTIN CHU DARREN K. INDYKE LLC Attorney for Defendant Jeffery Epstein BY:

ry Epstein, and BY: MICHAEL MILLER JUSTIN CHU DARREN K. INDYKE LLC Attorney for Defendant Jeffery Eps

OEC 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 All right. OK. I know people personally and professionally at Boies Schiller. I knew Mr. Haddon when I was in private practice. I may know people at Steptoe, but I'm not sure. Nothing about any of that affects anything that

tinued at 9:04 a.m. 2 2 VIDEOGRAPHER: Are now on the video 3 On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein: 3 record. This is the 13th day of January. 2016. 4 DARREN K. INDYKE. PLLC 4 The time is 9:04 am. This is the videotaped 575 Lexington Ave.. 4th Fl. 5 New York, New York 5 deposition of Alan Dershowitz in the mat

ecord. This is the 13th day of January. 2016. 4 DARREN K. INDYKE. PLLC 4 The time is 9:04 am. This is th

s is the 13th day of January. 2016. 4 DARREN K. INDYKE. PLLC 4 The time is 9:04 am. This is the videot

ecord. This is the 13th day of January. 2016. 4 DARREN K. INDYKE. PLLC 4 The time is 9:04 am. This is the

Y: Right. And I just want to 3 representations that there wouldn't be any 4 be clear. Mr. Epstein's counsel has not 4 testimony with respect to Boies Schiller 5 appeared in this case. I argued this issue 5 Flexner or those allegations that have 6 before the judge. and I have a confidentiality 6 repe

icion that maybe Mr. Dershowitz when he had -- MR. SCOTT: I just got a call from a lawyer on the screen. His phone is not working, Epstein's lawyer, Darrin Indyke. Do you want to take a break for a second? MR. SIMPSON: Why don't we let him finish his answer. MR. SCAROLA: Finish the answer. MR. SCOTT: You're

is phone is not working, Epstein's lawyer, Darrin Indyke. Do you want to take a break for a second? MR. S

ys did you have a common interest privilege? A. Brad Edwards from, obviously, the law firm that I've been working with here. Also attorneys from the Boies Schiller law firm who were representing Virginia Roberts at that time. Q. Anyone else? A. The -- at that time, on December 30th, I don't know that it's dire

ed Feb. 16, 2021 (ECF No. 120), at 2 in Farmer v. Indyke, 19 Civ. 10475 (S.D.N.Y.); Order, dated Mar. 19,

exceeded the original expectation of about 100 claims.37 E. Procedural History In April 2021, Maxwell sought authorization to subpoena the law firm Boies Schiller for materials it submitted to EVCP on behalf of certain claimants. This Court denied the request, finding that Maxwell appeared to seek the materia

to intervene and stay the proceedings in Doe v. Indyke, No. 20 Civ. 484 (JGK), while the Government has

The defendant's motion is, at its core, premised on a false factual narrative. The defendant alleges, based on a New York Daily News article, that Boies Schiller and the Government colluded starting in at least early 2016 with the "precise[] design[]" of having the defendant "charged with perjury." (Def. Mot

to intervene and stay the proceedings in Doe v. Indyke, No. 20 Civ. 484 (JGK), while the Government has

The defendant's motion is, at its core, premised on a false factual narrative. The defendant alleges, based on a New York Daily News article, that Boies Schiller and the Government colluded 60 EFTA00095152 starting in at least early 2016 with the "precise[] design[]" of having the defendant "charged with